Skip to main content

Is socialwork.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas sociālo darbinieku biedrība Reviews

socialwork.lv favicon

Is socialwork.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas sociālo darbinieku biedrība

Check if socialwork.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
WordPress 6.5.5jQuery 3.7.1Google Analytics (ga.js)Embed Any Document pluginSimple Lightbox plugin
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:07:53 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas sociālo darbinieku biedrība operates as a professional non-profit association dedicated to advancing social work in Latvia. The website serves as a hub for news, conferences, ethical guidelines, and professional development resources targeted at social workers and related professionals. It holds a key position in the Latvian social services sector, providing valuable content and community engagement opportunities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with standard plugins and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but the absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.5.5jQuery 3.7.1Google Analytics (ga.js)Embed Any Document pluginSimple Lightbox plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization is positioned as a central professional body for social workers in Latvia, focusing on education, ethics, and community building. Its business model is non-profit, relying on membership, events, and publications to serve its audience. The website content reflects a stable and consistent brand with a clear target audience of social work professionals. The presence of conferences and ethical codes indicates active engagement in sector development. The lack of detailed business registration data limits deeper insights, but the site’s content and structure suggest a legitimate and established entity within the Latvian social services ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas sociālo darbinieku biedrība

Description:

Latvijas sociālo darbinieku biedrība is an organization focused on social work development in Latvia, providing news, conferences, ethical guidelines, and professional standards for social workers.

Key Services:
Organizing conferences and eventsPublishing news and articlesProviding ethical codes and professional standardsOffering membership and collaboration opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.5.5jQuery 3.7.1Google Analytics (ga.js)Embed Any Document pluginSimple Lightbox plugin
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional non-profit association site for social workers in Latvia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:15.204.206.213 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:50.116.62.225 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

16 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:15.204.206.213
Name Servers:
ns1.serverhostgroup.comDNS only
ns2.serverhostgroup.comDNS only
ns3.serverhostgroup.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: socialwork.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025060600, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:303ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:15.204.206.213 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:50.116.62.225 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress 6.5.5 with jQuery and several plugins such as Embed Any Document and Simple Lightbox. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking via the legacy ga.js script. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain and WordPress standard locations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations but maintains a clear navigation structure and consistent branding. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small non-profit organization but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website