Skip to main content

Is softwareworld.co a Scam? Security Check Results - SoftwareWorld Reviews

softwareworld.co favicon

Is softwareworld.co Safe? Security Analysis for SoftwareWorld

Check if softwareworld.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Google FontsFontAwesomeTabler IconsNode WavesNoUISlider+4 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:00:51 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SoftwareWorld operates as a professional software review and listing platform targeting businesses seeking software and related services. The website offers categorized software listings, user reviews, and ratings to assist businesses in selecting appropriate software solutions. It positions itself as a leading software review site with a clear focus on business users. Technically, the site is built on the Laravel framework and employs modern web technologies including Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS, indicating a secure baseline. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of contact information, suggests gaps in privacy compliance and user trust facilitation. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and CSRF tokens, but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsFontAwesomeTabler IconsNode WavesNoUISliderSwiperGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLaravel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SoftwareWorld's market positioning as a software review and listing platform targets businesses looking for software solutions. Its business model revolves around providing software visibility and user-generated reviews, likely monetized through listings or advertising. The platform covers multiple software categories and services, indicating a broad target customer base in the technology sector. The use of tracking tools like Google Analytics suggests data-driven marketing and user engagement strategies. The lack of explicit company contact details and privacy policies may limit trust among privacy-conscious users. The platform appears to be medium-sized with consistent branding and a professional web presence, but no information on founding year or parent company was found.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and CSRF protection in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no GDPR indicators. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SoftwareWorld

Description:

SoftwareWorld is a Best Software Review Website to find the best reviewed and top rated software products for your business. Increase your software visibility with us.

Key Services:
Software reviewsSoftware listingsService provider listingsUser reviews and ratings
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsFontAwesomeTabler IconsNode WavesNoUISliderSwiperGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLaravel
Frameworks:
Laravel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Secure form inputs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zeptomail.net.in include:secureserver.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:report@dmarc.em.secureserver.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(93 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:97.74.204.158
Name Servers:
ns67.domaincontrol.com
ns68.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
0: softwareworld-co.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025063002, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zeptomail.net.in include:secureserver.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Laravel PHP framework and uses modern front-end libraries and fonts such as Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and Tabler Icons. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. The site lacks some accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details were not discernible from the content.
Analyze Another Website