Skip to main content

Is sokolades-masaza.business.site a Scam? Security Check Results - sokolades-masaza.business.site Reviews

S

Is sokolades-masaza.business.site Safe? Security Analysis for Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

Check if sokolades-masaza.business.site is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 7:46:17 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at sokolades-masaza.business.site is currently inaccessible, returning a 404 Not Found error page with no visible content or business information. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the company's services, market position, or digital presence. The lack of metadata, structured data, or contact details further limits insight into the business. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or security features, indicating either a misconfigured or undeployed website. Security posture is minimal with no HTTPS or security headers observed. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to lack of content and transparency, and it is not possible to verify legitimacy or compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and business data, no business intelligence can be derived. There is no information on market positioning, competitive advantages, revenue streams, or customer segments. The domain is privacy protected in WHOIS, which is common for small or personal sites but reduces trust without supporting content. No partnerships or strategic insights are available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. No privacy or cookie policies are implemented, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not collect user data or have forms, reducing attack surface but also indicating minimal business activity. The lack of security best practices and transparency poses a risk if the site were to become active.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Deploy valid website content to replace the 404 error page to enable proper analysis and user engagement.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible, showing a 404 error page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ?all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:?all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:mailauth-reports@google.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

37/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(241 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.239.32.29
Name Servers:
ns1.googledomains.com
ns2.googledomains.com
ns3.googledomains.com
ns4.googledomains.com
SOA:Serial: 2014080601, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:33ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a Google-branded 404 error page with minimal HTML and no scripts or external libraries. There is no detectable CMS, framework, or hosting provider information. The site is not mobile optimized and lacks SEO or accessibility features. Performance cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, limiting technical transparency. Overall, the technical implementation is incomplete or misconfigured.
Analyze Another Website