Skip to main content

Is solana.ventures a Scam? Security Check Results - Solana Technology Services LLC Reviews

solana.ventures favicon

Is solana.ventures Safe? Security Analysis for Solana Technology Services LLC

Check if solana.ventures is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsJavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:10:52 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Solana Ventures operates as a venture capital entity focused on accelerating the growth of the Solana blockchain ecosystem by investing capital into promising crypto projects. The company positions itself as a key player within the blockchain investment space, targeting developers and teams building on Solana. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data and registrant details slightly reduces transparency. Security posture is moderate with no explicit security headers detected and no published incident response or security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked to a related domain, indicating compliance awareness. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business-focused with room for improvement in security and contact transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company leverages its position in the blockchain technology sector to provide venture capital funding, targeting early-stage crypto projects on the Solana platform. Its business model is investment-driven, focusing on growth acceleration through capital infusion. The partnership with solanalabs.com for policy hosting suggests a broader ecosystem collaboration. The lack of direct contact information and limited public registrant data may be a strategic privacy choice common in crypto ventures. The company appears small but specialized, with a clear niche in blockchain technology investment. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting credibility in the competitive crypto investment market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by modern Next.js deployment and external scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues, which are gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS transparency is common in crypto-related domains but reduces trust slightly. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, incident response info, and more transparent contact details.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Solana Technology Services LLC

Description:

Solana Ventures' mission is to accelerate the growth of the Solana blockchain and adjacent ecosystems by providing capital to the most promising teams building in the crypto ecosystem.

Key Services:
Capital investmentProject acceleration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScript
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.75.39 include:_spf.mailspamprotection.com ~all v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
duke.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sofia.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381041828, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.75.39 include:_spf.mailspamprotection.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, which support server-side rendering and good SEO. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and CSS files asynchronously, indicating a modular and performant architecture. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive images and layout. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Performance is moderate, likely due to image sizes and multiple script loads. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to user tracking and privacy compliance. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility would enhance overall quality.
Analyze Another Website