Skip to main content

Is solanalabs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Solana Labs Reviews

solanalabs.com favicon

Is solanalabs.com Safe? Security Analysis for Solana Labs

Check if solanalabs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Lenis (smooth scrolling)React (production UMD)Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.5.1+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:14:12 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Solana Labs is a technology company focused on accelerating the Solana blockchain ecosystem by developing products and companies such as Solana Mobile, Solana Incubator, and Solana Ventures. The website presents a professional and modern digital presence with rich multimedia content and clear branding aimed at web3 developers, startups, and blockchain investors. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries, React, and Webflow CMS, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that slightly impacts business credibility but does not detract from the overall professionalism of the site. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and WHOIS registration clarity.

Detected Technologies

GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Lenis (smooth scrolling)React (production UMD)Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.5.1Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inter)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Solana Labs occupies a strong position in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on ecosystem growth through product innovation, startup incubation, and venture capital investment. Their business model integrates technology development with strategic investments, targeting blockchain developers and emerging web3 companies. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and leverages partnerships with related domains to extend its market reach. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and a comprehensive digital footprint. The company’s operations suggest a medium-sized entity with a focus on technology innovation and ecosystem leadership.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and privacy compliance through cookie consent and policy disclosures. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The WHOIS data absence raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Solana Labs

Description:

Solana Labs develops products and companies that accelerate the Solana ecosystem.

Key Services:
Solana Mobile (hardware/web3 mobile device)Solana Incubator (startup accelerator)Solana Ventures (investment capital provider)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Lenis (smooth scrolling)React (production UMD)Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.5.1Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inter)
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Professional blockchain technology company website

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(309 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
duke.ns.cloudflare.com
sofia.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2379633849, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React, GSAP for animations, Lenis for smooth scrolling, and Webflow CMS for content management. Hosting is likely via Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring fast content delivery. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates a moderate level of analytics and tracking integration. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of some security headers and WHOIS transparency are areas for improvement.
Analyze Another Website