Skip to main content

Is solarway.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - solarway.lv Reviews

S

Is solarway.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if solarway.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Other
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:00:28 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website solarway.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3. This indicates the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or similar security mechanism blocking direct access to the site's content. Due to this, no business information, contact details, or policies are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure includes Bootstrap 5.3.3 and Google reCAPTCHA, but no CMS or hosting provider details are discernible. Security posture is limited to the presence of reCAPTCHA, with no visible security headers or SSL configuration data. Overall, the site cannot be fully assessed, resulting in a low trust and security score.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the lack of accessible content. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of registration details. No social media, contact emails, or phone numbers are present. The website appears to be protected by a security mechanism that restricts access, which may be standard for the business but limits external analysis. No partnerships or related domains are identifiable.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal but includes Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated access. No other security headers or policies are visible. The absence of accessible content and contact information limits the ability to assess compliance with GDPR or other regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which restricts legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity appears low from an external perspective, primarily due to lack of transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a publicly accessible landing page with business and contact information to improve transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification with Google reCAPTCHA v3 and no actual website content accessible, indicating a WAF or security challenge.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1288-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:e6f553b9981c4532b99ecb9e9311c18b@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:solarway.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/5/2025 (67 days)
SANs:solarway.lv, *.solarway.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.96.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.32.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001
Name Servers:
hank.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
zelda.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 2377559080, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. The page is minimal, serving only as a security verification gateway with no visible content or navigation. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Accessibility and mobile optimization are unknown. The site relies on external CDNs for resources. Technical debt or modernization opportunities cannot be evaluated without further access.
Analyze Another Website