Skip to main content

Is solayer.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Domains By Proxy, LLC Reviews

solayer.org favicon

Is solayer.org Safe? Security Analysis for Domains By Proxy, LLC

Check if solayer.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
ReactFramerCloudflare DNSJSPM CDNThree.js+11 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:32:52 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website solayer.org is a newly registered domain (February 2024) currently protected by a privacy service (Domains By Proxy, LLC). The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking content. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React, Framer, and a variety of contemporary JavaScript libraries and frameworks, indicating a high level of digital maturity. However, the website lacks substantive business content, contact information, and compliance policies such as privacy or cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing critical security headers and public security policies. Overall, the site appears to be in an early development or pre-launch phase with limited trust indicators and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing contact and incident response information, and implementing security best practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactFramerCloudflare DNSJSPM CDNThree.jsFirebaseStripeWagmiRainbowKitChakra UIMaterial UIReact RouterAxiosLodashMoment.jsTailwindCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of explicit business descriptions or contact details, the market positioning and business model of solayer.org cannot be confidently determined. The domain is registered under a privacy protection service, which is common for new or small websites but reduces transparency. The technology stack suggests a focus on modern web and possibly blockchain or web3 technologies, given the use of Wagmi and RainbowKit libraries. No partnerships, certifications, or revenue streams are evident from the content. The target audience and growth indicators remain unclear. The lack of marketing or analytics tools suggests the site is not yet fully operational or publicly marketed.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@0.22.0-staging.fb

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly configured, and the domain uses Cloudflare DNS, which provides some protection. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS is a notable gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis, but the lack of visible security best practices and policies reduces overall security confidence. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Domains By Proxy, LLC

Description:

No explicit business description found in the content. The domain is newly registered and appears to be under privacy protection.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactFramerCloudflare DNSJSPM CDNThree.jsFirebaseStripeWagmiRainbowKitChakra UIMaterial UIReact RouterAxiosLodashMoment.jsTailwindCSS
Frameworks:
ReactFramer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:7cfd4ff2412f4f4a9261ec45a9f8fe2d@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(151 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
Name Servers:
arturo.ns.cloudflare.com
molly.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381494623, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and extensive JavaScript technology stack centered around React and Framer, with integrations for blockchain/web3 libraries such as Wagmi and RainbowKit. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare DNS, enhancing availability and some security aspects. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced SEO or structured data detected. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built. Technical risks include the absence of security headers and potential technical debt from the large number of external dependencies. Modernization opportunities include improving accessibility, SEO, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website