Skip to main content

Is somesebaltic.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA “SOMESE Baltic” Reviews

S

Is somesebaltic.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA “SOMESE Baltic”

Check if somesebaltic.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Google Tag ManagerjQuery 1.8.2Swiper.jsCustom JavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:21:47 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA “SOMESE Baltic” is a small Latvian company specializing in BTL marketing campaigns across the Baltic region, with over 20 years of experience. Their services include graphic design, micro programming, lotteries, contests, promotions, and event organization. The website is professionally designed, primarily in Latvian, targeting FMCG brands and businesses seeking promotional support. Technically, the site uses older but functional technologies such as jQuery 1.8.2 and Swiper.js, with Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and updated libraries. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but would benefit from improved security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerjQuery 1.8.2Swiper.jsCustom JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as an experienced regional BTL marketing service provider with a flexible and efficient project organization structure. Their portfolio showcases diverse campaigns for notable clients, indicating a solid market presence in the Baltic FMCG sector. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts for campaign design, programming, and event management. The target audience includes FMCG brands and retailers in Latvia and neighboring countries. The company maintains direct client contact channels and a visible team, supporting trust and client engagement. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes collaborations with event partners and promotional vendors.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (5)

j*****@somese.lv
a*****@somese.lv
l*****@somese.lv
b*****@somese.lv
d*****@somese.lv

Phone Numbers (3)

+3712657****
+3712934****
+3712727****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible blocking or WAF mechanisms. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.2) introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms are present, minimizing input-related risks, but privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. Incident response contacts or security policies are not found. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA “SOMESE Baltic”

Description:

Professional BTL campaign organization in the Baltic region with over 20 years of experience, specializing in lotteries, contests, design, micro programming, promotions, and events.

Key Services:
DizainsMikro programmēšanaLoterijas un konkursiPromocijas un pasākumi
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerjQuery 1.8.2Swiper.jsCustom JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.105.203.38
Name Servers:
ns.serveri.lvDNS only
ns2.serveri.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.somesebaltic.lv
SOA:Serial: 2007032201, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom-built front-end with jQuery 1.8.2, Swiper.js for sliders, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The CSS is modular with responsive stylesheets targeting different screen widths, indicating attention to mobile optimization. No CMS or backend platform is detected from the HTML. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The site lacks modern frameworks or progressive web app features. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the HTML. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website