Skip to main content

Is spanvall.fr a Scam? Security Check Results - Spanvall Reviews

spanvall.fr favicon

Is spanvall.fr Safe? Security Analysis for Spanvall

Check if spanvall.fr is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingFrancemedium
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+4 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:22:05 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Spanvall is a medium-sized, family-owned business specializing in the manufacturing and global distribution of high-quality animal bedding products tailored for various livestock including poultry, cattle, horses, and pigs. With over five decades of industry experience, the company maintains a strong market position supported by patented products and a commitment to sustainability and animal welfare. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact and product information, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security measures include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response policies. Overall, Spanvall demonstrates a credible and trustworthy online presence aligned with its business operations.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagreCAPTCHA v3Commoninja widgetsCountry Phone Field Contact Form 7 plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Spanvall operates in the manufacturing and agriculture sectors, focusing on animal bedding solutions. Its business model includes direct sales and distribution partnerships, supported by flexible logistics options. The company targets a diverse customer base from private clients to large-scale farms and distributors. The multilingual website and international domains indicate a global market reach. Trust indicators such as testimonials and patented technology reinforce its competitive advantage. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common for commercial entities. Spanvall's strategic focus on sustainability and CO2 neutrality by 2030 positions it well within evolving market and regulatory trends.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@spanvall.dk

Phone Numbers (1)

+4570260***

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and formalizing security governance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Spanvall

Description:

Spanvall est une entreprise mondiale spécialisée dans la fabrication et la fourniture de litière animale de haute qualité pour divers types d’élevages, notamment volailles, bovins, chevaux et cochons. L'entreprise est familiale de deuxième génération avec plus de 53 ans d'expérience, offrant des solutions adaptées et flexibles en logistique et livraison.

Key Services:
Fabrication de litière animaleLivraison logistique flexibleConseil en agriculture rentable
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagreCAPTCHA v3Commoninja widgetsCountry Phone Field Contact Form 7 plugin
Frameworks:
WordPressFlatsome theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsLinkedIn AdsDoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing Tools:
Commoninja widgets
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(42 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:93.191.156.213
Name Servers:
ns1.simply.com
ns2.simply.com
ns3.simply.com
ns4.simply.com
SOA:Serial: 2024121600, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and several plugins for forms, consent management, and analytics. It leverages modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and reCAPTCHA v3 for tracking and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and prefetching strategies to improve performance. While the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, the use of CDN services and external scripts suggests a distributed infrastructure. Performance is moderate with opportunities to optimize loading times further. The technical stack is current but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website