Skip to main content

Is spanvall.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - Spanvall Reviews

spanvall.pl favicon

Is spanvall.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Spanvall

Check if spanvall.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingDenmarkmedium
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+5 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 2:12:07 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Spanvall is a Denmark-based company specializing in the production and import of animal bedding products for various livestock, with a strong focus on poultry bedding. The company serves customers domestically and internationally, emphasizing flexible delivery options and quality assurance. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information, supporting its market presence and credibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent, though explicit security headers are not detected. The absence of WHOIS data slightly impacts trust but does not overshadow the overall legitimacy indicated by the website content and contact details.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Country Phone Field Contact Form 7 pluginContact Form 7Flatsome theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Spanvall operates in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors, targeting livestock farmers and agricultural businesses. Its business model revolves around producing and distributing high-quality animal bedding, supported by patented technology and reliable logistics. The company maintains a multi-language web presence, indicating a strategic approach to international markets. Key competitive advantages include product specialization, quality control, and flexible delivery methods. The presence of LinkedIn and detailed contact information suggests a transparent and professional business operation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@spanvall.dk

Phone Numbers (1)

+4570260***

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response information limits insight into the company's security governance and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Spanvall

Description:

Spanvall is a producer and importer of animal bedding for all types of livestock, specializing in poultry bedding. The company is based in Kalundborg, Denmark, and supplies customers in Denmark, Europe, and beyond. They emphasize flexibility in delivery methods and quality control.

Key Services:
Production and import of animal beddingDelivery logistics including trucks and shipsQuality control and analysis
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Country Phone Field Contact Form 7 pluginContact Form 7Flatsome theme
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Consent management plugin for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsLinkedIn Ads
Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Ads Conversion Tracking
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(157 days)

DNS Records

A Records:93.191.156.213
Name Servers:
ns1.simply.comDNS only
ns2.simply.comDNS only
ns3.simply.comDNS only
ns4.simply.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2024121600, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:512ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and several plugins including Contact Form 7 and a consent manager. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern web fonts. Performance is moderate, with prefetching of key assets. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website