Skip to main content

Is sparkcapital.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Spark Capital Reviews

sparkcapital.com favicon

Is sparkcapital.com Safe? Security Analysis for Spark Capital

Check if sparkcapital.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
jQuery 3.5.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWebflow CMS
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:06:39 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Spark Capital is a venture capital firm investing in innovative products and founders across various sectors and stages. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting entrepreneurs and technology innovators. The business model focuses on venture capital investment and founder support, positioning Spark Capital as an established player in the technology investment space. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is via a reputable CDN (Cloudfront), ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.5.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWebflow CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Spark Capital operates in the venture capital sector with a focus on technology startups and innovative products. The firm emphasizes investing in founders and products they admire, indicating a founder-centric approach. The website content and social media presence (Twitter) support a credible market position. The business model relies on venture funding and portfolio company growth. No direct revenue streams or detailed financials are disclosed on the site. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and may warrant further investigation. The company targets entrepreneurs and innovators, with a medium-sized digital footprint. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are mentioned.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no security certifications are mentioned. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures detected. The lack of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing website but could be improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Spark Capital

Description:

Spark Capital invests in products we love by creators we admire across all sectors and stages.

Key Services:
Venture capital investmentStartup fundingFounder support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.5.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWebflow CMS
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
Webflow hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:173.166.51.113 ip4:67.154.102.226 include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:re+q652p5sqass@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns23.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns24.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
30: aspmx4.googlemail.com
30: aspmx5.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025061800, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:372ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:173.166.51.113 ip4:67.154.102.226 include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, providing good content delivery performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern HTML and CSS standards. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but requires enhancements in security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website