Is spartangroup.io Safe? Security Analysis for The Spartan Group
Check if spartangroup.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The Spartan Group is a Web3-focused advisory and investment firm that partners with entrepreneurs to build and invest in blockchain and decentralized technology projects. The website presents a professional image with clear messaging about its business focus on Web3, targeting entrepreneurs and investors in this emerging technology sector. The site is built using Framer CMS and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the technical infrastructure is modern and the site is mobile optimized, there is a lack of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and no visible contact information, which impacts user trust and privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but the absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable or blocked, which limits transparency and trustworthiness assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact transparency to improve credibility and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The Spartan Group operates in the technology sector, specifically within the Web3 and blockchain space, providing advisory and investment services. Its business model revolves around partnering with entrepreneurs to build and fund innovative projects. The company targets a niche audience of Web3 entrepreneurs and investors, positioning itself as a key player in this emerging market. The website content is focused and relevant, but lacks detailed business information such as company founding year or physical location. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned. The use of modern web technologies indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may hinder potential client engagement and regulatory compliance.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. However, there is no evidence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected that require special security considerations. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the site's preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
The Spartan Group
We advise, invest and build with the best entrepreneurs in Web3.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 89 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings