Skip to main content

Is spdx.org a Scam? Security Check Results - SPDX Reviews

spdx.org favicon

Is spdx.org Safe? Security Analysis for SPDX

Check if spdx.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
WordPressPHPJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:18:07 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SPDX is a well-established open source project under the Linux Foundation, specializing in standardizing software license metadata to improve compliance and transparency in software supply chains. The website reflects a mature and professional presence, targeting developers, legal teams, and enterprises involved in software compliance. The project benefits from the credibility and support of the Linux Foundation, positioning it as a leading standard in its niche. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot and Google Analytics. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data, though it lacks a public security policy or incident response contacts. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpotFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SPDX operates as an important entity within the open source technology sector, providing essential licensing standards and tools. Its business model is community-driven and foundation-supported, focusing on open standards rather than direct revenue. The project targets a specialized audience including developers, legal professionals, and organizations managing software compliance. Its market position is strong due to Linux Foundation backing and widespread adoption of SPDX standards. The website content and structure support its mission effectively, with clear documentation and resources. Partnerships with the Linux Foundation and integration with other open source projects enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active community engagement and continuous updates to licensing standards.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@linuxfoundation.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness from a security governance perspective. The use of third-party scripts such as HubSpot and Facebook Pixel introduces some tracking risks but is common in professional sites. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Recommendations include publishing a security policy, implementing a vulnerability disclosure process, and providing clear incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SPDX

Description:

SPDX is a project under the Linux Foundation focused on standardizing the way software licenses and related metadata are communicated, facilitating compliance and transparency in software supply chains.

Key Services:
SPDX License ListSPDX SpecificationTools and Resources for License Compliance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpotFontAwesomeGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Linux Foundation hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
HubSpot Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and maintained by a reputable open source foundation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300; includeSubDomains;"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:alpha-omega.dev
Issuer:R13
Valid Until:12/3/2025 (88 days)
SANs:alpha-omega.dev, aousd.org, camaraproject.org +35 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:23.185.0.4
AAAA Records:2620:12a:8000::4, 2620:12a:8001::4
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.comDNS only
ns2.dnsimple-edge.netDNS only
ns3.dnsimple.comDNS only
ns4.dnsimple-edge.orgDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1582921036, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging PHP and JavaScript, with integrations including HubSpot for marketing and analytics, Google Tag Manager, and FontAwesome for icons. The site uses modern fonts and CDN resources for performance. While the site loads moderately fast, there is potential for optimization in asset delivery and caching. The mobile experience is good, and SEO practices such as meta tags and structured data are implemented. Accessibility is basic, with scope for improvement. The technical infrastructure is stable and appropriate for the site's purpose, with no major technical debt or risks identified.
Analyze Another Website