Skip to main content

Is speedcurve.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SpeedCurve Reviews

S

Is speedcurve.com Safe? Security Analysis for SpeedCurve

Check if speedcurve.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptMixpanelGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)LeadfeederPerformanceObserver API+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:03:11 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SpeedCurve is a specialized SaaS company focused on website performance monitoring and optimization. Their platform offers comprehensive tools to track web performance metrics, identify bottlenecks, and improve user experience. The company targets web performance teams, developers, SEO specialists, and business stakeholders aiming to enhance site speed and conversion rates. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with detailed service descriptions, client testimonials, and industry benchmarks, positioning SpeedCurve as a trusted player in the web performance monitoring market. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Mixpanel, Google Analytics, and Leadfeeder. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with asynchronous script loading and good accessibility features. However, explicit cookie consent mechanisms are not evident, which may be a compliance gap. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website content and client references strongly indicate legitimacy. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. Overall, the site maintains a good security posture but could benefit from additional security headers and published policies. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to improve privacy compliance by implementing cookie consent and publishing security policies. Enhancing transparency around incident response and data protection officers would further strengthen trust. The site’s technical and business maturity supports its position as a reliable service provider in the web performance monitoring industry.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptMixpanelGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)LeadfeederPerformanceObserver APICustom performance monitoring scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SpeedCurve operates in the technology sector, providing web performance monitoring and consulting services primarily through a SaaS model. Their market positioning is strong, supported by a portfolio of reputable clients such as BBC, Expedia, and Walmart. The company leverages a combination of synthetic and real user monitoring to deliver actionable insights. Their business model focuses on subscription revenue with added value from consulting and performance culture coaching. The target customer segments include medium to large enterprises with a focus on front-end development, SEO, product management, and marketing teams. Growth indicators include active content marketing, detailed case studies, and continuous feature enhancements. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with analytics and scheduling platforms. Strategic observations highlight a focus on performance culture and competitive benchmarking as differentiators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

SpeedCurve demonstrates a moderate to high security maturity level. The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading for third-party scripts to reduce attack surface. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which are important for compliance and customer trust. GDPR compliance is partially indicated through the privacy policy, but lack of cookie consent mechanisms is a gap. No known vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. The security culture is implied through consulting services but not explicitly documented on the site. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SpeedCurve

Description:

SpeedCurve provides website performance monitoring services that help track how users experience website speed, identify performance issues, and fix them. They offer coaching and consulting to build a performance culture within organizations.

Key Services:
Web Performance MonitoringPerformance BudgetsCore Web Vitals TrackingCI/CD Pipeline IntegrationCompetitive BenchmarkingRegression MonitoringConsulting & Support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptMixpanelGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)LeadfeederPerformanceObserver APICustom performance monitoring scripts
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
MixpanelGoogle AnalyticsLeadfeeder
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
MixpanelLeadfeeder
Marketing Tools:
MixpanelLeadfeeder
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1829 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.148.61, 13.248.241.119, 35.71.131.46, 13.248.144.105
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns2.dnsimple.com
ns3.dnsimple.comDNS only
ns4.dnsimple.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript-based analytics and tracking tools such as Mixpanel, Google Analytics, and Leadfeeder. It employs asynchronous script loading to optimize performance and reduce blocking. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features including focus-visible outlines and skip links. Meta tags and Open Graph data are well implemented for SEO and social sharing. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. Performance is fast with optimized images and fonts. The site uses custom scripts for performance monitoring and user interaction tracking. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by adding security headers and formalizing privacy mechanisms.
Analyze Another Website