Skip to main content

Is spingo.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - Faktoria Reviews

spingo.pl favicon

Is spingo.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Faktoria

Check if spingo.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commercePolandsmall
jQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerCookiebotYoast SEO pluginWordPress
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:31:28 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Faktoria operates in the e-commerce sector providing payment deferral services under the Spingo brand, targeting B2B clients to ease trade transactions. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, optimized for mobile devices. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the site reflects a legitimate, small-sized business with a stable domain history and consistent branding.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerCookiebotYoast SEO pluginWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Faktoria positions itself as a niche financial service provider in the Polish e-commerce market, focusing on payment deferral solutions. The business model is B2B, serving companies needing flexible payment options. The website integrates marketing and analytics tools like Hubspot and Facebook Pixel, indicating active customer engagement and lead generation efforts. No direct contact information or terms of service were found, which could be improved to enhance trust. The domain age and WHOIS data support a credible and established presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@faktoria.pl
k*****@faktoria.pl

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating good privacy practices. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts were found, and security headers appear absent or not disclosed. The use of third-party marketing and analytics tools introduces moderate tracking but is managed via consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Add a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Faktoria

Description:

Odraczanie płatności w e-commerce. Spingo jest odpowiedzią na wszystkie bolączki w obrocie handlowym między firmami.

Key Services:
Odraczanie płatności (payment deferral)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerCookiebotYoast SEO pluginWordPress
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Hubspot analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Meta Platforms, Inc.Google
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelGoogle test_cookie
Marketing Tools:
HubspotCallpage
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000; includeSubDomains"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

95/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:6063105.spf03.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(340 days)

DNS Records

A Records:51.83.141.26, 45.223.178.210
Name Servers:
dns.home.plDNS only
dns2.home.plDNS only
dns3.home.plDNS only
MX Records:
10: faktoria-pl.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1587638710, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:6063105.spf03.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie management. Hosting is provided by home.pl S.A., a reputable Polish hosting provider. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. SEO is enhanced by Yoast plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security headers and advanced performance optimizations are recommended.
Analyze Another Website