Skip to main content

Is spotx.tv a Scam? Security Check Results - Magnite Reviews

spotx.tv favicon

Is spotx.tv Safe? Security Analysis for Magnite

Check if spotx.tv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/aenterprise
Google Tag ManagerMarketo MunchkinLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Hotjar+5 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:45:27 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Magnite is a leading independent sell-side advertising company specializing in programmatic advertising technology across multiple channels including Connected TV (CTV), streaming, online video, display, and audio. The company serves media owners and advertisers globally, providing advanced technology and services to optimize advertising revenue and audience targeting. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a strong market position, supported by multiple industry awards and recognitions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight, ensuring good digital maturity and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR indicators. Overall, Magnite presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-structured online presence suitable for its enterprise audience.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerMarketo MunchkinLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)HotjarYoast SEO PremiumWordPressWPML (multilingual plugin)SearchWP Live Ajax SearchSwiper.js (for sliders)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Magnite operates in the media and advertising technology sector, focusing on programmatic advertising solutions for publishers and brands. Its business model revolves around providing a sell-side platform and ad server technology (including SpringServe) to maximize advertising revenue and efficiency. The company targets media owners, advertisers, and brands seeking global scale and advanced brand protection. The presence of multiple partner and subsidiary domains indicates a broad ecosystem and strategic partnerships. The website content and awards suggest a strong competitive advantage and leadership in CTV supply. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel, typical for enterprise businesses. The multilingual support indicates a global market reach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Use of asynchronous loading for tracking and marketing scripts reduces performance impact and potential security risks. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which are areas for improvement. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure for general users but could enhance its security maturity by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Magnite

Description:

The world's top publishers trust Magnite to help them drive more advertising revenue across every channel and format, including CTV.

Key Services:
Advertising revenue optimizationProgrammatic advertising across multiple channels and formats including CTVStreaming ad server and SSP (SpringServe)Brand protection and audience targeting
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerMarketo MunchkinLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)HotjarYoast SEO PremiumWordPressWPML (multilingual plugin)SearchWP Live Ajax SearchSwiper.js (for sliders)
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjarLinkedIn InsightMarketo Munchkin
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Rubicon Project (DV+)
Tracking Pixels:
Marketo MunchkinLinkedIn InsightHotjar
Marketing Tools:
Marketo
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

82/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:72.34.113.100 ip4:69.194.143.140 include:spf.magnite.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:mktomail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@magnite.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(40 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.192.120.101
Name Servers:
ns-139.awsdns-17.comWHOIS only
ns-1439.awsdns-51.orgWHOIS only
ns-1867.awsdns-41.co.ukWHOIS only
ns-842.awsdns-41.netWHOIS only
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:72.34.113.100 ip4:69.194.143.140 include:spf.magnite.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:mktomail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. It uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders and WPML for multilingual support, indicating a well-structured and user-friendly design. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts but overall user experience is smooth. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO Premium plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical infrastructure supports a large enterprise with global reach and complex content needs.
Analyze Another Website