Skip to main content

Is sprig.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Sprig Reviews

sprig.com favicon

Is sprig.com Safe? Security Analysis for Sprig

Check if sprig.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerSegment Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:30:20 PM
70
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Sprig is a mature technology company offering an AI-native research platform designed for UX teams to capture and analyze user feedback efficiently. The platform integrates advanced survey capabilities, in-product feedback tools, session replays, heatmaps, and AI-driven insights to help businesses make data-backed product decisions. The company targets a broad audience including user researchers, designers, product managers, marketers, and engineers, positioning itself competitively against established players like Qualtrics and Medallia. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, JavaScript libraries, and integrates with popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Segment, and HubSpot. Hosting is provided via AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The website demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and user experience, with clear navigation and professional content. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place; however, DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected, representing areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, Sprig presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerSegment AnalyticsUnify Intent TagHubSpot Scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Sprig operates in the technology sector, focusing on UX research and product experience analytics. Its SaaS business model leverages AI to differentiate its offerings, providing faster and more actionable insights than traditional research platforms. The company has established a solid market position with notable customers such as Square, Ramp, Coinbase, and Figma, indicating strong adoption among enterprise and mid-market clients. Sprig's ecosystem includes integrations with popular collaboration, prototyping, and research tools, enhancing its value proposition. The absence of explicit contact information suggests a focus on digital engagement through demos and online resources. Growth indicators include active content marketing via blogs, webinars, and events, as well as a template gallery to support user onboarding. Strategic partnerships and integrations further strengthen its market reach. The company’s long domain age and consistent branding reinforce its legitimacy and stability in the competitive UX research market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Sprig demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection to prevent unauthorized changes. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies indicates potential gaps in security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but the missing cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is extensive, which requires careful data protection management. Overall, Sprig should enhance its security headers, enable DNSSEC, and provide clear incident response information to improve its security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sprig

Description:

Sprig is a unified research platform built for UX teams who need fast, relevant user insights. Powered by AI, Sprig helps you do more research in less time by capturing and analyzing real-time feedback and behavioral data at scale.

Key Services:
Long-Form SurveysIn-Product SurveysFeedback CollectionUser Session ReplaysHeatmapsAI Insights and Analysis
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerSegment AnalyticsUnify Intent TagHubSpot Scripts
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and scripts)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No DNSSEC enabled (not ideal)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Segment for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerSegment AnalyticsHubSpot
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Segment AnalyticsHubSpot
Marketing Tools:
SegmentHubSpotUnify Intent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:8224380.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:u9595947.wl198.sendgrid.net include:_spf.salesforce.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1240-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@sprig.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1604 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.68.56, 3.164.68.84, 3.164.68.47, 3.164.68.99
Name Servers:
ns-1076.awsdns-06.org
ns-15.awsdns-01.com
ns-1691.awsdns-19.co.uk
ns-647.awsdns-16.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2021090101, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:8224380.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:u9595947.wl198.sendgrid.net include:_spf.salesforce.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.5.1. It integrates with Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, HubSpot, and Unify Intent for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting is provided by AWS, as indicated by the DNS nameservers. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times with efficient use of CDN-hosted assets. The HTML and CSS are valid and structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security configuration. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a technical and compliance gap. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust but can benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website