Skip to main content

Is springdesign.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Ascensus s.r.o. Reviews

A

Is springdesign.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Ascensus s.r.o.

Check if springdesign.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics (urchin.js)
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 3:59:08 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Springdesign.cz is a Czech graphic design and marketing service provider operating since 1999 under the parent company Ascensus s.r.o. The company offers original graphic design, web design, corporate identity, outsourcing, and marketing psychology services targeting local businesses. The website presents a professional team and partner affiliations but lacks modern digital maturity features such as privacy policies, secure HTTPS, and mobile optimization. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and an outdated Google Analytics script loaded insecurely over HTTP, which poses security risks. No contact forms or direct contact information are provided on the site, limiting user engagement and compliance with data protection regulations. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and privacy compliance is poor with no cookie or privacy policies. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to meet current standards.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics (urchin.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small, specialized design agency with a clear focus on creative graphic and web design services enhanced by marketing psychology expertise. Its market position is niche and local, supported by a longstanding presence since 1999. The company leverages partnerships with local organizations and promotes its parent company Ascensus s.r.o. The business model is service-oriented with no evident e-commerce or subscription elements. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts. The website's limited digital presence and lack of contact details may constrain growth and client acquisition. Strategic partnerships and branding consistency provide some competitive advantage, but modernization and compliance upgrades are needed to enhance market credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security posture is weak. It lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, uses an outdated and insecurely loaded Google Analytics script, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies. No forms or input fields are present to assess secure data handling. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies indicates low security maturity. These gaps expose the site to risks such as data interception, privacy non-compliance, and reduced user trust. Immediate implementation of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures is recommended to mitigate risks and align with GDPR requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ascensus s.r.o.

Description:

Springdesign.cz offers original graphic design services to represent companies, services, or products. Operating since 1999, the team includes a professional graphic designer, programmer, and advertising psychologist to deliver creative and effective designs.

Key Services:
Graphic designWeb designCorporate identityOutsourcingMarketing psychology
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics (urchin.js)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • No forms detected to analyze for secure inputs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (urchin.js)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (urchin.js)
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is in Czech language targeting local Czech businesses.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:77.93.220.68
Name Servers:
ns.anafra.net
ns2.anafra.net
MX Records:
10: mx1.anafra.net
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:169ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It uses an outdated Google Analytics tracking script loaded over HTTP, which is insecure. The site does not appear mobile-optimized and has minimal SEO and accessibility features. No content management system or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern technologies and optimization. The site structure is simple with clear navigation but limited interactivity or dynamic content. Technical debt is present due to legacy scripts and lack of security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, updating analytics, enhancing mobile responsiveness, and implementing accessibility standards.
Analyze Another Website