Skip to main content

Is sqd.ai a Scam? Security Check Results - Subsquid Reviews

sqd.ai favicon

Is sqd.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Subsquid

Check if sqd.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerPostHog analyticsPlausible analyticsApexCharts+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:02:28 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Subsquid (SQD) operates a decentralized data indexing and access network designed to serve AI agents and blockchain participants. The platform supports over 150 networks and offers a powerful SDK and cloud-hosted services to facilitate fast, scalable, and cost-effective data indexing. Positioned as an emergent open database network, Subsquid targets developers, node operators, delegators, and gateways within the blockchain ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with strong community engagement, including a significant GitHub repository and active social media channels.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerPostHog analyticsPlausible analyticsApexChartsSwiper.jsThree.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Subsquid's market positioning leverages its decentralized network model and comprehensive SDK toolkit to differentiate itself in the blockchain indexing space. The business model focuses on enabling data access at scale for AI and Web3 applications, with revenue likely generated from network participation and cloud services. The target audience includes blockchain developers and AI integrators. The company demonstrates growth potential through its ecosystem partnerships and active developer support. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and privacy policies may limit trust for some stakeholders.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@subsquid.ioschedule

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response plans suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and improving transparency around data protection practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve privacy compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Subsquid

Description:

SQD unlocks indexing and data access at a speed, scale, and price never before possible. 150+ networks supported. Decentralized network.

Key Services:
SQD Network (delegators, node operators, gateways)Squid SDK (indexing toolkit)SQD Cloud (hosted indexing service)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerPostHog analyticsPlausible analyticsApexChartsSwiper.jsThree.js
Frameworks:
WebflowReact (likely for some components)Three.js for canvas animation
Platforms:
Webflow hosting
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)PostHogPlausible
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PostHogPlausible
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(733 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
laylah.ns.cloudflare.com
nile.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382451082, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:222ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript libraries including Three.js for animations, ApexCharts for data visualization, and Swiper.js for UI components. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, PostHog, and Plausible, indicating a mature approach to user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized, fast loading, and well structured for SEO. Hosting is managed by Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure. Technical debt appears minimal, but the site could benefit from additional accessibility features and explicit security headers.
Analyze Another Website