Skip to main content

Is srab.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - srab.lv Reviews

S

Is srab.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

https://srab.lv/

Check if srab.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5
Analyzed 10/5/2025Completed 6:26:02 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website srab.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page powered by BitNinja.IO, which performs browser integrity checks and automatic redirects. The visible content is minimal, showing only a loading animation and a countdown timer. The site appears to be built on outdated CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, nor is there any contact or business information available on the page. The domain is active with Latvian name servers, but no registrant details are provided to verify legitimacy. Overall, the site lacks transparency and modern security practices, limiting trust and usability.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, it is not possible to determine the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The presence of Joomla and WordPress meta tags suggests a technology or content management focus, but no concrete business details are available. The domain is registered with Latvian name servers, indicating a local hosting provider. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of contact details and policies suggests a low level of business maturity or an incomplete website deployment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs a security challenge mechanism via BitNinja.IO, indicating some level of protection against automated threats. However, the use of outdated CMS versions poses significant security risks. No security headers are detected in the HTML content, and there is no visible HTTPS enforcement data. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The security score is low due to these factors, and the site is vulnerable to common CMS exploits. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found, further reducing security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade Joomla and WordPress installations to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security check with automatic redirect, browser integrity check script, and a notice 'Security check by BitNinja.IO'. No actual website content is accessible, indicating a WAF or security challenge page.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Browser integrity check script
  • Automatic redirect with countdown
  • Security check by BitNinja.IO

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security check page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.88 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:83.149.95.205
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lv
ns2.areait.lv
ns3.areait.lv
MX Records:
0: srab.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025092500, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.88 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses very old CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are no longer supported and pose security risks. The HTML content includes a browser integrity check script and an automatic redirect form, typical of a WAF or security challenge page. No modern JavaScript frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The site has basic mobile viewport settings but lacks advanced SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking. Hosting appears to be with a Latvian provider (areait.lv name servers). Overall, the technical implementation is outdated and requires modernization.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about srab.lv

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website