Skip to main content

Is ssbtimber.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SSBTimber Reviews

ssbtimber.lv favicon

Is ssbtimber.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SSBTimber

Check if ssbtimber.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderSlider RevolutionGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:52:38 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SSB Timber is a Latvian company specializing in forestry management, forest harvesting, land works, demolition, road and ditch construction, landscaping, and property management services. The company operates primarily in the Riga region, Zemgale, and Kurzeme. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and regional focus, targeting clients needing sustainable property and forestry solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and safe, but could improve transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderSlider RevolutionGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFontAwesomejQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a regional service provider in Latvia's forestry and property management sector, leveraging over 15 years of experience. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive land and forestry services to clients in specific Latvian regions. The website content is targeted at property owners and businesses requiring land development, forestry management, and related services. The absence of detailed business registration data and contact information on the site limits deeper business intelligence. The company uses standard digital marketing and analytics tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (4)

i*****@ssbtimber.lvPal
i*****@ssbtimber.lv
i*****@ssbtimber.lv.SSBTimber
i*****@redar.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are present, which could hinder incident handling and user trust. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Buttonizer requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SSBTimber

Description:

SSB Timber piedāvā profesionālus pakalpojumus mežsaimniecībā, mežizstrādē, zemes darbos, demontāžā, ceļu un grāvju izbūvē, labiekārtošanā un īpašumu apsaimniekošanā. Darbības reģioni: Rīgas reģions, Zemgale, Kurzeme.

Key Services:
Forestry managementForest harvestingLand worksDemolitionRoad and ditch constructionLandscapingProperty management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderSlider RevolutionGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFontAwesomejQuery
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with consent
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Buttonizer
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.162.130 include:ssbtimber.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.233.6
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
10: mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
30: mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
SOA:Serial: 91, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:298ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.162.130 include:ssbtimber.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a common and flexible platform. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance appears moderate with some heavy images but generally good structure. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and services. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium business website but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website