Is sseriga.edu Safe? Security Analysis for Stockholm School of Economics in Riga
Check if sseriga.edu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The Stockholm School of Economics in Riga website presents a professional educational institution offering a range of academic programs including bachelor, master, and executive MBA degrees. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and comprehensive content about educational offerings, research centers, and student services. The technical infrastructure is based on Drupal 8 CMS, utilizing modern web technologies and third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, implemented with user consent mechanisms. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and publicly available security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing domain trustworthiness, though the website content and branding strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site is suitable for its target audience of students and academic professionals, with good privacy compliance and user experience.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
SSE Riga occupies a recognized position in the Baltic education market, focusing on economics and business education. Its business model centers on delivering degree programs and executive education, supported by research centers and student services. The institution targets prospective and current students, academic researchers, and business professionals. The website reflects a medium-sized educational entity with consistent branding and trust signals such as privacy policies and cookie consent. The partnership with admission.sseriga.edu indicates a segmented approach to admissions and course management. The lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main site may limit direct engagement but is typical for academic institutions relying on contact forms.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent aligned with GDPR, indicating a baseline security and privacy posture. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of publicly available security or incident response policies and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism reduces transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a security red flag, potentially indicating misconfiguration or privacy protection that is not justified for an educational institution. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and configure standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Stockholm School of Economics in Riga
Stockholm School of Economics in Riga (SSE Riga) is an educational institution offering bachelor, master, executive MBA, and executive education programs focused on economics, business, and management. It provides various academic programs, research centers, and student services.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional educational institution site for Stockholm School of Economics in Riga
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration
LOWCurrent value: "nosniff, nosniff"
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings