Skip to main content

Is ssl.org a Scam? Security Check Results - SSL.org Reviews

ssl.org favicon

Is ssl.org Safe? Security Analysis for SSL.org

Check if ssl.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3jQuery 3.7.1Matomo AnalyticsGoogle FontsFontAwesome (fa-duotone-900)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:36:25 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SSL.org operates as a specialized online platform offering free tools for SSL certificate checking, CSR generation and decoding, and server security diagnostics. The website targets IT professionals, developers, and website administrators seeking to validate and troubleshoot SSL/TLS certificate installations. The business is positioned as a niche service provider within the technology sector, with a focus on cryptographic security and web server configuration analysis. The site is branded consistently and provides clear, relevant content about SSL and TLS protocols, enhancing its credibility in the cybersecurity domain. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, and Matomo analytics, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, some SEO and accessibility features are basic, and performance is moderate. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and secure form inputs but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, but the domain appears legitimate and well-maintained. Overall, SSL.org presents a professional and trustworthy service with room to enhance compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3jQuery 3.7.1Matomo AnalyticsGoogle FontsFontAwesome (fa-duotone-900)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SSL.org's market positioning as a free SSL diagnostic tool provider leverages the growing demand for web security validation. Its partnership or affiliation with IBAN.com suggests a stable operational backing. The business model focuses on providing value-added free tools, likely supported by ancillary services or partnerships. The target customer segments include IT professionals and website owners requiring SSL validation and troubleshooting. Growth indicators include the breadth of tools offered and integration of analytics for user insights. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes IBAN.com, which may provide financial or infrastructural support. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact channels to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published security contacts or policies. The security culture appears focused on technical correctness but lacks transparency and formal documentation. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security posture and user confidence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SSL.org

Description:

Provides free online tools for SSL certificate checking, CSR generation and decoding, SSL matcher, server config generator, cipher suite mapping, and vulnerability scanning related to TLS/SSL certificates and server security.

Key Services:
SSL Certificate CheckerCSR GeneratorCSR DecoderSSL MatcherServer Config GeneratorCipher Suite MappingVulnerability ScannerServer Headers Analysis
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3jQuery 3.7.1Matomo AnalyticsGoogle FontsFontAwesome (fa-duotone-900)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and content)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form input sanitization implied by JS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website provides specialized SSL/TLS diagnostic tools and educational content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3302 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:34.90.220.148
Name Servers:
ns15.domaincontrol.com
ns16.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023112001, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. Google Fonts and FontAwesome provide consistent typography and iconography. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs which may affect load times depending on user location. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO meta tags and accessibility improvements. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries, indicating good maintenance practices.
Analyze Another Website