Skip to main content

Is stables.money a Scam? Security Check Results - Stables Reviews

stables.money favicon

Is stables.money Safe? Security Analysis for Stables

Check if stables.money is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inconsolata)Amplitude AnalyticsIntercom Chat WidgetSwiper.js+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:27:11 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Stables is a fintech platform focused on enabling users to buy, sell, send, and spend stablecoins such as USDC, USDT, DAI, and PYUSD through a stablecoin card. The company positions itself as an innovator bridging cryptocurrency stablecoins with everyday financial transactions, targeting cryptocurrency users and fintech consumers. The website is built on modern technologies including Webflow CMS, Amplitude analytics, and Intercom chat, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and security.txt for vulnerability disclosure. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is common in fintech but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve trust and compliance by publishing key policies and contact information.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inconsolata)Amplitude AnalyticsIntercom Chat WidgetSwiper.jsFinsweet Cookie Consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Stables operates in the finance sector, specifically in cryptocurrency and stablecoin services. Its business model revolves around providing a card product that integrates stablecoins into daily spending, appealing to crypto holders seeking real-world usability. The company maintains active social media channels on Twitter, LinkedIn, Discord, and Telegram, supporting community engagement. The lack of visible company registration or contact details on the website suggests a startup or early-stage company. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for fintech startups to safeguard sensitive registrant data. The platform leverages analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and growth.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent with opt-in mechanisms, reflecting good security hygiene. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security policy or incident response contact information is provided, limiting transparency in security governance. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program reduces the ability for external researchers to report issues responsibly. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Stables

Description:

One place to spend, send and earn stablecoins like USDC, USDT, BUSD. Until today you haven't been able to use stablecoins in the real world, now we're bringing them to your everyday life.

Key Services:
Buy stablecoinsSell stablecoinsSend stablecoinsSpend stablecoins via card
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Inconsolata)Amplitude AnalyticsIntercom Chat WidgetSwiper.jsFinsweet Cookie Consent
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
AmplitudeGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Amplitude
Marketing Tools:
IntercomAmplitude
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:customer.mailguard.com.au -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:Security-Alerts@tiiik.com.au
Forensic Reports:Security-Alerts@tiiik.com.au

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:44.229.220.222, 34.217.231.110, 99.83.190.102, 34.210.109.146, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
harvey.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
karsyn.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: filter1.stable-1.mailguard.com.au
20: filter2.stable-1.mailguard.com.au
30: filter3.stable-1.mailguard.com.au
SOA:Serial: 2382372083, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:customer.mailguard.com.au -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern frontend libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Amplitude for analytics. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Intercom for customer support chat. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's infrastructure, with assets served from their CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site includes a cookie consent banner with preference management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Technical risks include the lack of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy documentation.
Analyze Another Website