Skip to main content

Is stamp.fyi a Scam? Security Check Results - stamp Reviews

S

Is stamp.fyi Safe? Security Analysis for stamp

Check if stamp.fyi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:41:03 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at stamp.fyi is currently a minimal placeholder site containing only a JSON snippet indicating a project name, version, and commit hash. There is no visible business description, metadata, or user-facing content. The lack of WHOIS data due to unsupported TLD further limits the ability to verify domain ownership or legitimacy. Technically, the site lacks modern SEO, accessibility, or security features, and no contact or policy information is present. This suggests the site is either under development or serves a very limited internal or technical purpose rather than a public-facing business platform. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation and absence of security headers or policies.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No substantive business information is available from the website or WHOIS data. The domain appears to be small scale with no clear market positioning or services. There are no contact details, certifications, or trust indicators. The business model and target audience cannot be determined. The lack of external links or partnerships further indicates limited operational scope or public presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy policies indicates a basic or incomplete security implementation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency and trust. There are no visible vulnerabilities but also no evidence of proactive security measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

stamp

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal, consisting only of a JSON snippet with version and commit hash.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:stamp.fyi
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:10/13/2025 (36 days)
SANs:stamp.fyi

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.48.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001
Name Servers:
nola.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
zeus.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2381780418, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:43ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses minimal HTML with no metadata, no external scripts, and no detectable CMS or frameworks. The content is a simple JSON snippet embedded in a <pre> tag. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies are present. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no visible performance or hosting details. The technical implementation is basic and lacks modern web standards or optimizations.
Analyze Another Website