Skip to main content

Is standesk.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - standesk.eu Reviews

standesk.eu favicon

Is standesk.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Standesk | Everything for perfect workplace 🚀

Check if standesk.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Wixcore-jsfocus-within-polyfill
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:03:17 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.standesk.eu is a small business site hosted on the Wix platform, indicated by the presence of Wix-specific scripts and assets. The site content is minimal and primarily technical scaffolding without visible detailed business descriptions or contact information. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, limiting transparency about the registrant and domain age. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and no contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which impacts the site's credibility and compliance posture. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and standard Wix technologies but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy compliance indicators. Overall, the site appears safe with no adult or explicit content detected, but the lack of business and security information reduces trust and professional appearance.

Detected Technologies

Wixcore-jsfocus-within-polyfill

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of explicit business information on the site and no WHOIS registrant data, the business intelligence is limited. The site likely represents a small European business or individual using Wix for web presence. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or market positioning details. The business model and target audience cannot be determined from the available content. The lack of contact details and policies suggests a basic online presence without advanced customer engagement or regulatory compliance focus.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate given the use of HTTPS and some cookie handling restrictions. However, the absence of security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in security best practices and compliance readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the accessible content. The lack of WHOIS transparency and privacy protection reduces trustworthiness from a security perspective. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting the ability to report security issues.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wixcore-jsfocus-within-polyfill
Platforms:
Wix.com
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie handling with restrictions on certain cookies

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

48/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.standesk.eu ~all v=spf1 include:eu.zcsend.net ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:23.236.62.147
Name Servers:
ns67.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns68.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072300, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:eu.zcsend.net ~all v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.standesk.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Wix platform using standard Wix scripts and polyfills for browser compatibility. The site uses HTTPS and loads assets from Wix static content delivery networks. Performance is moderate with typical Wix overhead. Mobile optimization is good due to Wix's responsive design features. Accessibility features are basic with no advanced ARIA or semantic enhancements detected. SEO optimization is minimal with no structured data or rich metadata beyond basic meta tags. The site lacks advanced frameworks or custom technologies, indicating a straightforward Wix site without custom backend or integrations.
Analyze Another Website