Skip to main content

Is starknet.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Starknet Reviews

starknet.io favicon

Is starknet.io Safe? Security Analysis for Starknet

Check if starknet.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPress CMSGeneratePress themejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:58:51 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Starknet is a blockchain technology platform focused on scaling Bitcoin and Ethereum through advanced zero-knowledge proof technology (STARKs). It provides a Layer 2 scaling solution that enhances computational integrity and scalability while maintaining security and decentralization. The platform targets developers, DeFi users, and the broader crypto community, offering extensive developer resources, tools, and ecosystem support including wallets, bridges, and grants. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and optimized for user experience across devices. Technically, it leverages WordPress CMS with modern libraries and frameworks, integrating Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure form handling, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in this sector, but the domain is actively maintained and consistent with the business identity. Overall, Starknet presents a credible, trustworthy, and technically mature web presence aligned with its innovative blockchain services.

Detected Technologies

WordPress CMSGeneratePress themejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Algolia searchLottie animationsSlick carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Starknet occupies a leading position in the blockchain Layer 2 scaling market, uniquely bridging Bitcoin and Ethereum ecosystems. Its competitive advantage lies in its use of STARK technology for computational integrity and scalability, attracting a rapidly growing developer community. The business model focuses on providing infrastructure, developer tools, and ecosystem grants to foster innovation and adoption. Revenue streams likely include ecosystem partnerships and developer engagement. The target customers are blockchain developers, DeFi projects, and crypto users seeking scalable solutions. The company maintains active partnerships with ecosystem projects and community platforms, enhancing its market reach and credibility. Strategic observations highlight strong community engagement, continuous content updates, and a focus on decentralization and security.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the front-end code. Compliance with GDPR is implied through the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formal vulnerability disclosure channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Starknet

Description:

Starknet uses STARK tech for computational integrity, validating off-chain transactions with advanced math and cryptography.

Key Services:
Layer 2 scaling using STARK technologyDeveloper resources and toolsBridges and on-rampsEcosystem support including wallets, dApps, and grants
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress CMSGeneratePress themejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Algolia searchLottie animationsSlick carousel
Frameworks:
WordPressGeneratePress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "DENY;, DENY;"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(101 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.136.54, 162.159.137.54
Name Servers:
ns-1469.awsdns-55.org
ns-1593.awsdns-07.co.uk
ns-503.awsdns-62.com
ns-684.awsdns-21.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the GeneratePress theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Lottie for animations, and Slick for carousels. It integrates Algolia for search functionality and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of some scripts to improve initial load times. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to optimize security headers and enhance privacy compliance. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified, indicating a well-managed infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website