Skip to main content

Is staticfile.org a Scam? Security Check Results - 河南泉磐网络科技有限公司 Reviews

Is staticfile.org Safe? Security Analysis for 河南泉磐网络科技有限公司

Check if staticfile.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
Next.jsReactJavaScriptCSSCDN
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:06:58 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Staticfile.org is operated by 河南泉磐网络科技有限公司, a Chinese company established in 2013. The website provides a free, fast, and open CDN service focused on hosting and accelerating access to popular open source libraries such as React, Vue, Angular, and jQuery. It targets developers and open source communities by offering a repository for static files including JavaScript, CSS, images, and other assets. The platform supports library submissions from users, fostering community contributions. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, delivering a responsive and performant user experience. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and multilingual support (Chinese and English). Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms a long-standing domain registration consistent with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Staticfile.org is a credible and technically sound service with room for improvement in privacy and security policy transparency.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactJavaScriptCSSCDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Staticfile.org occupies a niche in the technology sector as a free CDN provider for open source libraries, leveraging partnerships with entities like Qiniu Cloud and community support from Juejin. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on providing infrastructure rather than direct monetization. The target market includes developers and organizations requiring reliable CDN access to popular frontend libraries. The company benefits from a stable domain registration and a consistent brand presence. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and formal policies may limit enterprise adoption. The platform's integration with GitHub for feedback and social media sharing indicates active community engagement. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and enhancing compliance and security measures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, posing compliance risks especially under GDPR. No contact emails or phone numbers related to security or abuse handling were found. Overall, while the site is not evidently vulnerable, it lacks comprehensive security governance and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

河南泉磐网络科技有限公司

Description:

提供一个免费、快速、开放的CDN服务仓库,收录优秀开源库并为其提供CDN加速服务,支持JavaScript、CSS、图片和swt等静态文件的提交和访问。

Key Services:
CDN加速服务开源库托管与访问开源库提交入口
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactJavaScriptCSSCDN
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides free CDN services for open source libraries.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

30/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No MX records found

MEDIUM

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2779 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:134.122.173.178, 134.122.189.6, 27.124.9.124, 118.107.44.62
Name Servers:
u1.xundns.com
u2.xundns.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern tech stack featuring Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and efficient client-side interactivity. The use of preloading for fonts and CSS indicates attention to performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be further enhanced. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of a custom analytics script and CDN usage indicates a well-managed infrastructure. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with minor areas for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Analyze Another Website