Skip to main content

Is stepn.com a Scam? Security Check Results - stepn.com Reviews

stepn.com favicon

Is stepn.com Safe? Security Analysis for STEPN OG

Check if stepn.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Framer
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:49:53 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.stepn.com presents itself as a technology-oriented platform with a focus on fitness or step counting, as indicated by the title 'STEPN OG' and the description 'Make your steps count!'. The site is built using Framer, a modern web design tool, but the content is minimal and lacks detailed business or contact information. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details raises concerns about transparency and trustworthiness. Technically, the site is moderately optimized but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, which are critical for user trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is basic, with no evident vulnerabilities but also no strong security measures. The risk assessment suggests moderate caution due to missing registrant data and lack of compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

Framer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to target general consumers interested in fitness or step tracking technology. However, the lack of detailed business information, contact details, or policy documents limits the ability to assess market positioning or revenue models. The site does not reveal partnerships or subsidiaries, and no analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a low digital maturity level. The business model and market presence remain unclear, suggesting either an early-stage or minimal online footprint.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

u*****@stepn.comEcosystemCompanyAboutCareersContactLinktreeInformationTerms

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from canonical URL), but no security headers or incident response contacts are found. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance or cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registrant data and domain status information further reduces trust. No forms or data collection points are present, minimizing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Make your steps count!

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com a mx include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.revue.co ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:email-reports@stepn.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(523 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.161.6, 31.43.160.6
Name Servers:
a1-222.akam.net
a11-66.akam.net
a20-64.akam.net
a28-65.akam.net
a8-66.akam.net
a9-67.akam.net
MX Records:
10: mailstream-west.mxrecord.io
50: mailstream-central.mxrecord.mx
10: mailstream-east.mxrecord.io
SOA:Serial: 2025061703, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com a mx include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.revue.co ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, indicating a modern design approach. However, the technical implementation is basic with limited SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Performance is moderate with no detected analytics or tracking scripts. The site lacks advanced technical configurations such as security headers or structured data beyond basic meta tags. There is an opportunity to improve technical maturity by adopting SEO best practices, accessibility standards, and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website