Skip to main content

Is stiftung-ap3.li a Scam? Security Check Results - stiftung-ap3.li Reviews

stiftung-ap3.li favicon

Is stiftung-ap3.li Safe? Security Analysis for stiftung-ap3.li

https://stiftung-ap3.li

Check if stiftung-ap3.li is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLiechtensteinsmall
WordPressBrizy BuilderjQuerywp-emoji
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 4:30:04 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website stiftung-ap3.li appears to represent a small foundation or organization based in Liechtenstein, as indicated by the domain and language. The site is built on WordPress using the Brizy page builder, with minimal content and no visible business descriptions, contact information, or legal policies. Technically, the site uses standard WordPress technologies but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The security posture is basic, with no detected vulnerabilities but also no strong security practices. Overall, the site presents low business credibility due to the absence of contact and policy information. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, contact details, and implementing security best practices to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBrizy BuilderjQuerywp-emoji

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind stiftung-ap3.li is not clearly described on the website. The domain is registered in Liechtenstein with consistent WHOIS data, suggesting legitimacy. The lack of detailed business information, contact channels, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or business model. The site likely targets a local or niche audience but does not provide clear services or offerings. There are no visible partnerships or related domains. The foundation may be in early stages or maintain a low digital footprint.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@stiftung-ap3.lihttps

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of security best practices and policies is a concern. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBrizy BuilderjQuerywp-emoji
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
PHPMySQL
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is built on WordPress with Brizy page builder.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:193.108.137.80
Name Servers:
ch.pro.ioDNS only
nl.pro.ioDNS only
p.dnh.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: stiftungap3-li02b.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024020200, TTL: 1440s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:147ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with the Brizy page builder plugin, using standard web technologies including jQuery and wp-emoji scripts. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and WordPress core domains. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile responsiveness appears good due to modern CSS usage. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site does not use analytics or tracking services, indicating minimal data collection.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about stiftung-ap3.li

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website