Skip to main content

Is stirnubuks.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Stirnu Buks Reviews

S

Is stirnubuks.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Stirnu Buks

Check if stirnubuks.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviamedium
Firebase (auth, firestore, analytics)jQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook Pixel+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:17:12 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Stirnubuks.lv is a professionally maintained website dedicated to organizing and promoting trail running events primarily in Latvia. It serves a community of trail runners by providing detailed information on upcoming races, past event results, participant statistics, and related news. The platform leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, Firebase for authentication and data management, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing pixels such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR standards. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Firebase authentication, but lacks explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the site shows no suspicious indicators and appears legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital maturity with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency of contact information.

Detected Technologies

Firebase (auth, firestore, analytics)jQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelTikTok PixelTailwind CSS (commented but CSS classes used)JavaScript ES Modules

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the niche of sports event organization, specifically trail running, targeting active individuals and sports enthusiasts in Latvia and neighboring regions. It maintains a strong community presence with thousands of participants in events and active social media channels. The business model revolves around event management, participant registration, and community engagement. The website's content and structure suggest a medium-sized organization with consistent branding and good market positioning within its sector. The use of Firebase and modern analytics tools indicates a focus on digital engagement and data-driven marketing. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and WHOIS transparency limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Firebase authentication implemented for user management. It includes cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and security.txt reduces its security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security policies, incident response contact information, and regular security audits of third-party scripts and Firebase rules. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Stirnu Buks

Description:

Stirnubuks.lv is a website dedicated to organizing and providing information about trail running events (taku skrējiens) in Latvia and nearby regions. It offers details about upcoming races, previous events, participant statistics, and news related to the trail running series.

Key Services:
Trail running event organizationParticipant registration and managementEvent information disseminationResults publicationCommunity news and updates
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Firebase (auth, firestore, analytics)jQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelTikTok PixelTailwind CSS (commented but CSS classes used)JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks:
WordPress theme frameworkFirebase SDK
Platforms:
WordPressFirebase
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Firebase authentication
  • Cookie consent script included
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFirebase AnalyticsFacebook PixelTikTok Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelTikTok Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Firebase Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content about trail running events.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:167.172.184.120
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns2.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns3.digitalocean.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1750860798, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:125ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and integrates Firebase services for authentication and data storage. It uses modern JavaScript modules and includes multiple analytics and marketing pixels for user tracking and engagement. The site is mobile responsive and uses Tailwind CSS classes for styling, although the Tailwind CDN script is commented out, indicating possible local CSS usage. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could benefit from improved security headers and performance optimization.
Analyze Another Website