Skip to main content

Is stkprochlapy.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - stkprochlapy Reviews

stkprochlapy.cz favicon

Is stkprochlapy.cz Safe? Security Analysis for stkprochlapy

Check if stkprochlapy.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareCzech Republicsmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Colibri Page Builder ProSwiper.jsFancybox+2 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 12:58:37 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

stkprochlapy.cz is a Czech patient organization website dedicated to supporting men with urological cancers. The site provides information on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and psychological support, targeting patients and their families. The organization positions itself as a compassionate guide through illness and health, leveraging personal experience to offer a human approach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Colibri Page Builder Pro and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and features a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits trust assessment, but the website content and structure appear professional and legitimate. Overall, the site serves a niche healthcare support role with moderate digital maturity and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Colibri Page Builder ProSwiper.jsFancyboxGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Complianz GDPR plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a small non-profit healthcare support entity focused on urological cancer patients in the Czech Republic. Its business model centers on providing educational content, psychological support, and community engagement rather than commercial services. The presence of social media channels indicates active outreach and community building. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information online suggests a focus on privacy or a grassroots organizational structure. The site’s content quality and navigation support user engagement, positioning it well within its specialized market segment. Partnerships or related domains are not explicitly identified, indicating a standalone operation or limited external affiliations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but could be improved by implementing additional headers and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

stkprochlapy

Description:

Web pacientské organizace STK pro chlapy, která pomáhá mužům s urologickým nádorovým onemocněním. Poskytuje informace o prevenci, diagnostice, léčbě a psychologické podpoře.

Key Services:
informace o prevenci a léčbě urologických nádorůpsychologická podporanovinky z oblasti diagnostiky a léčbyprůvodce léčbou a prevencí
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Colibri Page Builder ProSwiper.jsFancyboxGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Complianz GDPR plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google Site Kit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a patient organization site focused on men's urological cancer support.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sparkpostmail.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.cesky-hosting.cz include:spf.active24.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:31.15.10.56
Name Servers:
ns1.wia.cz
ns2.wia.cz
MX Records:
10: mx1.active24.com
20: mx2.active24.com
SOA:Serial: 2024010702, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sparkpostmail.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.cesky-hosting.cz include:spf.active24.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress 6.8.2 with popular plugins including Colibri Page Builder Pro, Swiper.js for sliders, Fancybox for media display, and Complianz for GDPR cookie management. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure or scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small healthcare support website, though opportunities exist to improve security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website