Is stranger.social Safe? Security Analysis for stranger.social
Check if stranger.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Stranger.social is an independent Mastodon instance providing a federated social networking platform where users can engage in microblogging and community interaction. The platform positions itself as a friendly and welcoming community open to everyone, leveraging the open-source Mastodon software to participate in the fediverse. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with a modern tech stack including React and Ruby on Rails, hosted likely on Linode infrastructure. The user interface is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides active user statistics and administrative transparency through visible admin accounts. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or terms of service pages. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for such platforms but limits transparency. Overall, stranger.social is a legitimate, small-scale social platform with room for improvement in privacy and security disclosures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Stranger.social operates as a small independent social networking service within the federated Mastodon ecosystem, targeting general users interested in decentralized social media. Its business model is community-driven without evident commercial advertising or monetization on the site. The platform benefits from open-source technology and a transparent admin presence, which supports trust and community engagement. The absence of detailed business or contact information suggests a focus on privacy and community rather than commercial enterprise. The platform's market position is niche but relevant within the growing fediverse. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth indicators include active user counts and recent posts. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen credibility.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (21)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of stranger.social is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of explicit incident response contacts or security policies limits the platform's readiness to handle security incidents. Privacy policy exists but lacks comprehensive GDPR compliance indicators or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the platform demonstrates basic security hygiene but should improve in policy transparency, security header implementation, and incident response preparedness to meet higher security standards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
stranger.social
Welcome to Stranger Social, where strangers become friends and the world becomes a little smaller. We're a friendly and welcoming community that's open to everyone - so come on in and join the party!
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a Mastodon social networking instance with active user engagement
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=15724800; includeSubDomains"
Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration
LOWCurrent value: "0"
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin"
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DMARC record found
HIGHDMARC provides email authentication and reporting
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 55 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings