Skip to main content

Is straupesmaiznica.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - straupesmaiznica.lv Reviews

S

Is straupesmaiznica.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if straupesmaiznica.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:59:56 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at straupesmaiznica.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security CAPTCHA challenge page implemented by BitNinja. This page indicates that the visitor's IP address has been greylisted due to prior security concerns or automated traffic detection. The site content is minimal and serves only to validate human visitors via Google reCAPTCHA v2. There is no visible business or contact information, privacy or cookie policies, or terms of service present on the page. The metadata references legacy CMS platforms such as Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, suggesting outdated or misconfigured CMS usage. Technically, the site loads multiple external scripts including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking purposes, but lacks visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details in the provided data. The WHOIS lookup failed due to query limits, preventing domain registration and legitimacy verification. The security posture is weak given the blocking by BitNinja and absence of standard security headers. Overall, the site is in a blocked state, limiting content and business insights. The security challenge indicates prior security issues or automated abuse attempts. The lack of privacy and contact information further reduces trust and compliance posture. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving server security to prevent IP greylisting.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the site being blocked by a security CAPTCHA, no direct business information or market positioning can be determined. The metadata suggests the site may have been built on Joomla or WordPress platforms, but no company name, description, or contact details are provided. There are no visible trust indicators, certifications, or business sector information. The site appears to be small scale or legacy with minimal digital presence. The use of BitNinja security suggests the site or its hosting environment has experienced security incidents or automated abuse. No partnerships or related domains are identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently weak. The site is blocked by BitNinja's greylist mechanism requiring CAPTCHA validation, indicating prior suspicious or malicious activity from visitor IPs. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers are detected in the provided HTML content. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 is a positive control against bots. However, absence of privacy policies, cookie consent, and security best practices reduces compliance and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security configuration, policy transparency, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

Site is blocked by BitNinja security greylist requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible beyond a security CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:straupesmaiznica.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/18/2025 (79 days)
SANs:straupesmaiznica.lv, *.straupesmaiznica.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.96.1, 188.114.97.1
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3121::1, 2a06:98c1:3120::1
Name Servers:
nucum.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
syeef.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: _dc-mx.cd27aae37528.straupesmaiznica.lv
SOA:Serial: 2378476815, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS references (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) in metadata, which may indicate outdated software versions and potential security risks. The site loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts for tracking, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and focused on a security CAPTCHA challenge. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or platforms beyond these. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No SEO optimization or structured data is present. The hosting provider is not identified. The site lacks visible security headers and HTTPS enforcement details, representing technical debt and security risk.
Analyze Another Website