Skip to main content

Is strava.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - strava.cz Reviews

strava.cz favicon

Is strava.cz Safe? Security Analysis for strava.cz

Check if strava.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Next.jsReact
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:05:26 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at app.strava.cz/en is a minimal Next.js-based web application with very limited visible content or business information. The site appears to be a frontend application scaffold or a partial deployment without accessible privacy policies, terms of service, or contact details. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, but lacks visible SEO, accessibility, or performance optimizations. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to missing headers and SSL details, and no explicit security or incident response policies are found. Overall, the site is accessible and safe but lacks substantive content and compliance indicators, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReact

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business-related content, no clear market positioning, company name, or services are identifiable. The site does not provide contact information or legal disclosures, limiting insights into its business model or target audience. The lack of external links or partner domains suggests limited ecosystem integration. This minimal presence indicates either a development stage site or a restricted access portal without public-facing business intelligence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak based on the available data. No security headers are detected, and SSL configuration details are unavailable. There are no visible forms or inputs to assess secure handling of user data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting the ability to evaluate readiness for security events.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReact
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly technical scaffolding without visible business or policy information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:mail.visplzen.cz a:smtp.visplzen.cz a:smtp2.visplzen.cz a:wss5.strava.cz a:wss52.strava.cz -all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:82.99.180.77
Name Servers:
names.dialtelecom.cz
sns.dialtelecom.cz
MX Records:
1: mail.visplzen.cz
12801: ax.virusfree.cz
12849: dx.spamfree.cz
12833: cx.spamfree.cz
12817: bx.virusfree.cz

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern JavaScript-based frontend architecture. The HTML content is minimal and lacks meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset settings. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance is likely moderate given the use of modern frameworks but cannot be fully assessed without loading metrics. Accessibility and SEO optimizations appear basic or absent. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, suggesting limited tracking or user engagement measurement.
Analyze Another Website