Skip to main content

Is strednipolabi.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - strednipolabi.cz Reviews

S

Is strednipolabi.cz Safe? Security Analysis for 403: Access Forbidden

Check if strednipolabi.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:58:00 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website strednipolabi.cz is currently inaccessible, presenting a 403 Access Forbidden error page that blocks content based on visitor location. Due to this restriction, no meaningful business or content data can be extracted or analyzed. The domain is registered since 2013 under a Czech registrar and uses Czech hosting name servers, indicating a legitimate Czech entity. However, the lack of accessible content prevents assessment of the company's business model, services, or market position. Technically, the site appears to be protected by a security mechanism that restricts access from certain geographic locations, which impacts the ability to evaluate its digital maturity or security posture. No metadata, scripts, or tracking technologies are detectable in the provided HTML content. Security posture cannot be assessed beyond the presence of access restrictions. Overall, the site is rated low in content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to the lack of accessible data.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content, no direct business intelligence can be derived from the website itself. The domain age and registrar information suggest an established presence since 2013 in the Czech Republic. The domain uses hosting services from Forpsi, a Czech hosting provider. No information about company size, industry, or services is available from the site content. No contact or trust indicators are present. The business model, revenue streams, and partnerships cannot be determined. The website's blocking of access from Finland (FI) may indicate geo-restriction policies or security controls but does not provide insight into business operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is protected by a security mechanism that results in a 403 Access Forbidden error for visitors from certain locations, indicating some level of access control. However, no security headers, SSL configuration details, or security policies are visible in the provided data. No forms or input fields are present to assess secure data handling. The lack of visible privacy or cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. Overall, the security posture cannot be fully evaluated but the presence of access restrictions indicates some security controls are in place.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure website content is accessible to intended audiences or provide clear messaging and alternative access methods.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a 403 Access Forbidden error with a message indicating the visitor's location (FI) is blacklisted, indicating content is blocked by a security mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to a 403 Access Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:81.2.194.244
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071201, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:120ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with a 403 Access Forbidden error, indicating a security or access control mechanism blocking visitors from certain locations. No metadata, scripts, or external resources are loaded, preventing analysis of the technology stack or CMS. The domain uses Czech hosting name servers (Forpsi), suggesting local hosting. No performance or mobile optimization data is available. The lack of content and technical elements indicates either a restricted or misconfigured site environment. Modernization and technical improvements cannot be assessed until content access is restored.
Analyze Another Website