Is stx.is Safe? Security Analysis for Stacks
Check if stx.is is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Stacks.co is a professional and well-established platform focused on enabling Bitcoin Layer 2 smart contracts, decentralized applications, and DeFi solutions. It positions itself as the leading Bitcoin L2 platform, providing developer tools, documentation, and an ecosystem of apps and wallets. The website targets developers, Bitcoin users, and DeFi builders, offering resources to build on Bitcoin's secure base layer. The platform also promotes sBTC, a Bitcoin-backed asset that facilitates programmable Bitcoin use. Technically, the website is built on modern technologies including Webflow CMS, jQuery, Google Fonts, and uses Plausible for privacy-focused analytics. It is hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and follows several best practices, though some security headers are not explicitly visible. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which is common in crypto projects. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, with no signs of malicious or adult content.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Stacks operates in the blockchain technology and finance sectors, focusing on Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions. Its business model revolves around providing a platform and ecosystem for decentralized app development on Bitcoin, leveraging smart contracts and DeFi. The company benefits from a strong market position as a leading Bitcoin L2 platform, with a growing ecosystem of partners and apps. Revenue streams likely include developer tools, ecosystem growth, and possibly token-related services. The target customers are developers, crypto enthusiasts, and enterprises interested in Bitcoin-based DeFi. The presence of a bounty program and active community channels indicates a mature and engaged ecosystem. Strategic partnerships and open-source contributions enhance its competitive advantage. The lack of explicit company registration details is typical for blockchain projects but slightly reduces transparency.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. The use of a security-first smart contract language (Clarity) and a public bounty program indicates a proactive approach to security. However, the absence of explicit security headers in the HTML and no visible incident response or security policy pages are gaps that could be improved. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is good but could be enhanced with a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is strong for a blockchain ecosystem site but would benefit from more visible security governance documentation.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and visibly document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Stacks
Activate the Bitcoin economy with apps & smart contracts that use Bitcoin as a secure base layer.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security-first programming language Clarity mentioned
- Bounty program linked
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Strict DMARC Alignment
LOWStrict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 30 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings