Skip to main content

Is sudop.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - SUDOP PRAHA a.s. Reviews

sudop.cz favicon

Is sudop.cz Safe? Security Analysis for SUDOP PRAHA a.s.

Check if sudop.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationCzech Republiclarge
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:26:10 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SUDOP PRAHA a.s. is a specialist company focused on transport infrastructure, providing engineering and consulting services primarily in the Czech Republic. The company targets professionals and organizations involved in transport infrastructure projects such as railways, bridges, and roads. The website reflects a professional presence with a consistent brand and good content quality, supporting their market position as an established player in the transportation sector. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Mapbox GL JS, and others. The site uses a CMS platform (Movisio) and demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No WHOIS data was found, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good business credibility but could improve transparency and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelMapbox GL JSEmbla CarouselRellax

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on infrastructure engineering and consultancy. Their business model revolves around providing specialized project design and management services. The website indicates a large-sized company with a strong presence in the Czech Republic. Social media integration and professional branding suggest active engagement with their audience. The lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS data limits full business intelligence but the site content and social links support legitimacy and market relevance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but can be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SUDOP PRAHA a.s.

Description:

Specialist in transport infrastructure, offering services related to transport infrastructure projects including railways, bridges, and roads.

Key Services:
Transport infrastructure consultancyProject design and managementInfrastructure development
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag ManagerFacebook PixelMapbox GL JSEmbla CarouselRellax
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.active24.com include:spf.movisio.com mx ip4:80.188.48.201 ip4:80.188.48.202 ip4:80.188.48.203 ip4:80.188.48.204 ip4:80.188.48.211 ip4:81.0.208.137 ip4:185.175.85.14 ip4:31.15.10.2 ip4:31.15.10.135 ip4:81.95.96.148 ip4:167.89.67.200 -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:109.123.202.97
Name Servers:
alfa.ns.active24.czDNS only
beta.ns.active24.czDNS only
gama.ns.active24.sk
MX Records:
0: sudop-cz.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071701, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.active24.com include:spf.movisio.com mx ip4:80.188.48.201 ip4:80.188.48.202 ip4:80.188.48.203 ip4:80.188.48.204 ip4:80.188.48.211 ip4:81.0.208.137 ip4:185.175.85.14 ip4:31.15.10.2 ip4:31.15.10.135 ip4:81.95.96.148 ip4:167.89.67.200 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript libraries such as Embla Carousel, Rellax, and Mapbox GL JS for interactive and mapping features. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing. The CMS platform is Movisio, which supports modular content management. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard fonts from Google Fonts. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers and accessibility could be improved.
Analyze Another Website