Skip to main content

Is sunnyportal.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SMA Solar Technology AG Reviews

sunnyportal.com favicon

Is sunnyportal.com Safe? Security Analysis for SMA Solar Technology AG

Check if sunnyportal.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyGermanylarge
ASP.NET Web FormsRequireJSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerConsentManager.net
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:33:17 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SMA Solar Technology AG operates the Sunny Portal, a platform dedicated to monitoring and managing solar energy systems. The company is well-established, founded in 2004, and positioned as a key player in the solar energy sector, offering services such as energy management applications and user support. The website reflects a professional business model targeting solar system owners and professionals, providing tools and resources to optimize solar energy usage. Technically, the site is built on Microsoft ASP.NET Web Forms, utilizing RequireJS and jQuery, with integration of Google Tag Manager and a consent management system to comply with privacy regulations. The infrastructure appears stable with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR, but could improve in security header implementation and mobile accessibility. The domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, reinforcing legitimacy.

Detected Technologies

ASP.NET Web FormsRequireJSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerConsentManager.net

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SMA Solar Technology AG holds a strong market position in the renewable energy sector, focusing on solar technology and monitoring solutions. Their business model combines B2B and B2C elements, offering a platform for solar system monitoring and related software products. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and user resources. Revenue streams likely include software subscriptions, add-on sales via the online store, and service support. The target audience includes solar system owners, installers, and energy professionals. The company demonstrates growth potential through digital tools and app integrations. The partnership ecosystem includes related SMA domains and service portals, enhancing customer engagement and support.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent management reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security policies to improve trust and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SMA Solar Technology AG

Description:

Provider of Sunny Portal, a platform for monitoring and managing solar energy systems.

Key Services:
Solar system monitoringEnergy management appsUser manuals and supportOnline store for add-ons
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ASP.NET Web FormsRequireJSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerConsentManager.net
Frameworks:
Microsoft ASP.NET
Platforms:
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET)Chrome browser compatibility
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
ConsentManager.net
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:149.233.23.107 ip4:192.168.4.1 ip4:149.233.23.115 ip4:149.233.24.140 ip4:149.233.24.141 ip4:149.233.24.142 ip4:149.233.24.143 ip4:149.233.24.144 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1464-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:admin@sunnyportal.com
Forensic Reports:admin@sunnyportal.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(146 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:149.233.24.178
Name Servers:
ns1.eurodns.com
ns2.eurodns.com
ns3.eurodns.com
ns4.eurodns.com
MX Records:
20: 3nd-mailin.sunnyportal.com
20: 5nd-mailin.sunnyportal.com
20: 2nd-mailin.sunnyportal.com
20: 4nd-mailin.sunnyportal.com
10: mailin.sunnyportal.com
SOA:Serial: 2025040400, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:83ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:149.233.23.107 ip4:192.168.4.1 ip4:149.233.23.115 ip4:149.233.24.140 ip4:149.233.24.141 ip4:149.233.24.142 ip4:149.233.24.143 ip4:149.233.24.144 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET Web Forms framework, leveraging RequireJS for module loading and jQuery for DOM manipulation. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, integrated with a consent management platform to ensure GDPR compliance. The site uses a modular CSS and JavaScript approach with versioning for cache control. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is stable and consistent with the business. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential legacy code dependencies inherent in ASP.NET Web Forms.
Analyze Another Website