Skip to main content

Is supernext.com a Scam? Security Check Results - supernext.com Reviews

supernext.com favicon

Is supernext.com Safe? Security Analysis for SuperNext

https://supernext.com

Check if supernext.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 1:31:57 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SuperNext appears to be a design or technology-oriented website with a clean, modern aesthetic and a focus on branding. The domain is well-established, created in 2007, and hosted with Amazon Registrar, Inc. The technical infrastructure includes modern web fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics, although analytics and ad storage are denied by default, indicating a privacy-conscious setup. However, the website lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and contact information, which limits trust and transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but the content is minimal in textual information and lacks explicit business details.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website does not provide explicit business information such as company name, sector, or contact details, making it difficult to ascertain market positioning or business model. The domain age suggests a mature presence, but the lack of detailed content and policies indicates a small or early-stage business or a portfolio/presentation site. The use of Amazon Registrar and AWS DNS suggests a reliable hosting environment. The absence of social media links or partner domains limits visibility into the business ecosystem. The site targets a general audience with a focus on design and branding, but without clear service offerings or industry classification.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security measures include HTTPS and use of Google Tag Manager with restricted consent settings, which is positive for privacy. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a compliance gap. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses HTTPS and modern fonts.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2628000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(280 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:204.69.207.1
Name Servers:
ns-1297.awsdns-34.org
ns-15.awsdns-01.com
ns-1917.awsdns-47.co.uk
ns-650.awsdns-17.net
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern web fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics, hosted on infrastructure managed by Amazon Registrar, Inc. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and assets. However, no CMS or specific frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or static site. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and richer metadata for SEO.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about supernext.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website