Skip to main content

Is sushi.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Sushi Labs Reviews

sushi.com favicon

Is sushi.com Safe? Security Analysis for Sushi Labs

Check if sushi.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
ReactNext.jsRadix UIToastifyVercel Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:21:41 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SushiSwap is a decentralized finance platform focused on enabling effortless cryptocurrency trading across more than 30 blockchain networks. The platform offers a powerful aggregator to secure the best rates in DeFi, targeting crypto traders and DeFi users globally. The website demonstrates a professional and modern design, leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR standards. However, the absence of WHOIS data and registrant information introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate, with no explicit security headers detected and no visible vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts. Overall, the platform presents a trustworthy and professional front for DeFi services but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security policies.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsRadix UIToastifyVercel AnalyticsVercel Speed Insights

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SushiSwap operates as a leading decentralized exchange and aggregator in the DeFi space, offering token swaps, limit orders, dollar-cost averaging, and cross-chain swaps. Its business model revolves around providing decentralized liquidity and trading services to cryptocurrency users. The platform's market position is strong within the DeFi ecosystem, supported by a large user base and multi-chain integration. The company targets technologically savvy crypto traders and DeFi enthusiasts. While the website content is professional and consistent, the lack of explicit contact information and WHOIS transparency may affect some users' confidence. The platform uses modern web technologies and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust in the security community. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The overall security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sushi Labs

Description:

Trade crypto effortlessly with SushiSwap, supporting over 30 chains and featuring a powerful aggregator for the best rates across DeFi.

Key Services:
crypto swappinglimit ordersdollar-cost averagingcross-chain swaps
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsRadix UIToastifyVercel AnalyticsVercel Speed Insights
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Ethereum blockchain integration
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • cookie consent mechanism
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Vercel Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Vercel AnalyticsVercel Speed Insights
Marketing Tools:
Vercel Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or domain configuration

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@sushi.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

69/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1624 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:64.239.123.1, 64.239.109.1
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.com
ns2.vercel-dns.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1657686658, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using a modern React and Next.js stack, hosted on Vercel, which provides fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The use of Radix UI and Toastify indicates attention to user interface and notification management. Analytics and performance monitoring are handled via Vercel's own tools. The site includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing, enhancing discoverability. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and well-optimized, though improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended.
Analyze Another Website