Skip to main content

Is svangel.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SV Angel Reviews

S

Is svangel.com Safe? Security Analysis for SV Angel

Check if svangel.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsJavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:39:28 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SV Angel is a venture capital firm focused on investing in transformative technology companies by supporting founders with long-term partnerships. The website content emphasizes principles of founder advocacy, network building, and ethical business practices. However, the website currently suffers from a client-side application error that prevents full content accessibility, limiting user experience and information availability. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, hosted via Cloudflare, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating potential security improvements. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact information is provided, which impacts compliance and trust. The domain is well-established with a long registration history consistent with the business claims, enhancing legitimacy. Overall, the site requires technical fixes and policy implementations to improve security posture, compliance, and user trust.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SV Angel holds a strong market position as an early-stage venture capital firm with a portfolio including major technology companies such as Google, Airbnb, Stripe, and OpenAI. Their business model centers on providing capital and strategic support to founders, emphasizing long-term relationships and community growth. The firm targets technology entrepreneurs and startups, leveraging a network-driven approach to foster ecosystem development. Testimonials from notable CEOs reinforce their credibility and influence. The absence of explicit contact details and policies on the website suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and customer engagement. The firm appears to operate as a small-sized entity with a focused sector in technology investment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. The visible client-side application error may expose internal error details, potentially aiding attackers or degrading user trust. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting the firm's readiness to handle security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in header implementation, error handling, and policy disclosures to meet best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Fix the client-side application error to restore full website functionality and improve user experience.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SV Angel

Description:

SV Angel is an investment firm that helps build transformative companies by investing long-term in founders to enable positive change in business and the world. They emphasize principles such as attention to detail, founder advocacy, network nourishment, ethical conduct, and support at critical business inflection points.

Key Services:
Investment capitalFounder support and advisoryNetwork facilitationBusiness development assistance
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScript
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website currently shows a client-side application error, limiting content accessibility.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:i60bxvgs@ag.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2699 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ken.ns.cloudflare.com
zoe.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381782744, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, specifically React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary technical stack. Hosting is provided by Cloudflare, which offers performance and security benefits. Despite this, the site currently suffers from a client-side JavaScript error that prevents proper rendering of content. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for securing DNS and mitigating common web attacks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but requires improvements in SEO and error handling. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but needs remediation of front-end errors and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website