Skip to main content

Is svarko.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - SVARKO spol. s r.o. Reviews

S

Is svarko.cz Safe? Security Analysis for SVARKO spol. s r.o.

Check if svarko.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingCzech Republicmedium
jQuery 1.12.4WordPress 4.9.3Enfold Theme 4.2Google Fonts (Open Sans)MediaElement.js
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:16:33 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SVARKO spol. s r.o. is a Czech Republic based medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in technological and structural steel constructions, machine parts, and custom steel products. The company operates within a larger group, Multicraft Group, with multiple subsidiaries across Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Austria, indicating a strong regional industrial presence. Their key services include steel structures, weldments, tanks, industrial installations, and related manufacturing solutions targeting industrial and engineering sectors. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality, reflecting a mature business presence.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.12.4WordPress 4.9.3Enfold Theme 4.2Google Fonts (Open Sans)MediaElement.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company is positioned as an established player in the manufacturing and energy-related sectors, leveraging a group structure to provide comprehensive industrial solutions. Their business model focuses on B2B manufacturing with a strong emphasis on quality and flexibility. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and partner sites suggests a diversified portfolio and regional market penetration. The company emphasizes authentic Czech origin and innovation management as competitive advantages. However, the lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the main site may limit direct customer engagement online.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and standard WordPress security practices but runs on an outdated WordPress version (4.9.3) and jQuery (1.12.4), which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The absence of security.txt or similar files reduces transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update WordPress core and all plugins/themes to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SVARKO spol. s r.o.

Description:

Company focuses on the production of technological and structural steel constructions, machine parts and custom products (frames, shelves, containers, chassis) made of carbon and stainless steel. They offer technological steel structures, weldments and machine parts, tanks, silos and containers, industrial installations, air-coolers and shutters, lightning and traction towers, production halls and warehouses.

Key Services:
Technological steel structuresWeldments and machine partsTanks, silos and containersIndustrial installationsAir-coolers and shuttersLightning and traction towersProduction halls and warehouses
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.12.4WordPress 4.9.3Enfold Theme 4.2Google Fonts (Open Sans)MediaElement.js
Frameworks:
WordPressAvia Framework
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

35 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:46.28.105.24
Name Servers:
ns.wedos.com
ns.wedos.czDNS only
ns.wedos.eu
ns.wedos.net
MX Records:
1: wes1-mx1.wedos.net
1: wes1-mx2.wedos.net
SOA:Serial: 2025072701, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.3 using the Enfold theme and Avia Framework, with jQuery 1.12.4 and Google Fonts integration. Hosting and domain registration are managed by WEDOS, a Czech provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design but shows signs of technical debt due to outdated software versions. Performance is moderate with no advanced analytics or tracking scripts detected. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clean and professional layout. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security and compliance posture.
Analyze Another Website