Skip to main content

Is swiftdir.com a Scam? Security Check Results - swiftdir.com Reviews

S

Is swiftdir.com Safe? Security Analysis for swiftdir.com

Check if swiftdir.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 4:17:03 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The domain www.swiftdir.com appears to be unregistered or expired as indicated by the WHOIS raw data which returned no match. The website content is completely empty with no metadata, no visible content, no forms, no scripts, and no external links. This suggests the site is either inactive, blocked, or not yet developed. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present, nor any contact or business information. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technology stack or security headers, and no SSL certificate is evident. The overall security posture is very weak due to lack of HTTPS and security best practices. The domain registration inconsistency and lack of content severely impact the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the site.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business information, company name, or sector data is available from the website or WHOIS data. The absence of any content or contact details prevents any meaningful analysis of market positioning, business model, or partnerships. The domain appears inactive or unclaimed, indicating no current business operations or presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations. The domain's unregistered status raises concerns about legitimacy and potential misuse. Overall, the site is not secure and does not follow basic security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register or renew the domain to establish ownership and legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is empty (blank HTML body) indicating possible blocking or minimal content served. WHOIS query returned no match indicating domain may not be registered or active.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is completely empty with no metadata or visible content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:swiftdir.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/30/2025 (57 days)
SANs:swiftdir.com, *.swiftdir.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(80 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.188.24, 104.21.7.241
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3032::6815:7f1, 2606:4700:3036::ac43:bc18
Name Servers:
anita.ns.cloudflare.com
marek.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2376923979, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves an empty HTML page with no metadata, scripts, or detectable technologies. No CMS or frameworks are identified. The absence of content and technical elements indicates either a placeholder site or a blocked/inactive domain. Performance, SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available.
Analyze Another Website