Skip to main content

Is swotzy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Swotzy Reviews

swotzy.com favicon

Is swotzy.com Safe? Security Analysis for Swotzy

Check if swotzy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagMailerLite+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:22:33 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Swotzy is a delivery management software company offering a comprehensive logistics department solution wrapped into a single tool. The website positions itself as a SaaS provider targeting logistics and delivery service companies, leveraging extensive shipping data to optimize delivery operations. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with integrations including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and MailerLite for marketing automation. The site employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a baseline of security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service, along with missing WHOIS registration data, raises concerns about transparency and legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no obvious vulnerabilities, but security headers could be improved. Overall, the site presents a professional front but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and clearer business contact information.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagMailerLitePostHogCookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Swotzy operates in the transportation sector, focusing on logistics and delivery management software. Its business model is SaaS, targeting logistics companies and supply chain managers. The company appears to be recently founded (2023) with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content is consistent and professionally branded, with a clear focus on delivery management solutions. Marketing and analytics tools indicate an active effort to engage and retarget visitors. The lack of WHOIS data and contact details may hinder trust from potential customers. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified, suggesting a standalone operation or early-stage business.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@swotzy.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner, demonstrating compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts, which increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact information limits the site's readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Swotzy

Description:

Swotzy Delivery Management software is an entire Logistics Department wrapped into a single tool, backed by a vast amount of shipping data.

Key Services:
Delivery management softwareLogistics data analyticsShipping optimization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagMailerLitePostHogCookiebot
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsPostHog
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsFacebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagPostHog
Marketing Tools:
MailerLite
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking and marketing technologies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mailersend.net include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com a mx ip4:45.82.191.25 ip4:141.95.84.46 -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(265 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.76.188
Name Servers:
ns-1196.awsdns-21.org
ns-1697.awsdns-20.co.uk
ns-414.awsdns-51.com
ns-642.awsdns-16.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mailersend.net include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com a mx ip4:45.82.191.25 ip4:141.95.84.46 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS and integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, MailerLite, and PostHog analytics. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and optimized CSS. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data are properly implemented. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. No critical technical issues or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Analyze Another Website