Skip to main content

Is symbolic.capital a Scam? Security Check Results - Symbolic Capital Reviews

symbolic.capital favicon

Is symbolic.capital Safe? Security Analysis for Symbolic Capital

Check if symbolic.capital is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryFinsweet AttributesSuperflow
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:22:10 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Symbolic Capital is a venture capital firm specializing in people-driven Web3 investing. The company positions itself as a niche player in the blockchain and Web3 technology sector, offering investment services, research publications, fellowship programs, and career opportunities. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting Web3 investors and technology enthusiasts. The business model centers on venture capital investments in emerging Web3 projects, supported by thought leadership and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery, and Finsweet attributes. Hosting is provided via Webflow's CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though accessibility features could be improved. The site is free from broken elements and offers clear navigation and structure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration but lacks several security headers that could enhance protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is good, with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service present, though no cookie consent mechanism was found. Contact information is available via email and a contact form, but no phone numbers or incident response contacts are provided. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common and justified for this business type, though it limits domain trust verification. Overall, Symbolic Capital's website demonstrates a solid digital presence with good business credibility and security posture. Recommendations include implementing security headers, adding a cookie consent mechanism, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and enhancing accessibility to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryFinsweet AttributesSuperflow

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Symbolic Capital operates in the technology sector focusing on Web3 venture capital investments. Its competitive advantage lies in a people-driven investment approach and active community engagement through research and fellowship programs. The business model is investment-centric, targeting blockchain startups and projects. Revenue streams likely include equity stakes and investment returns. The target customer segments are Web3 investors and blockchain innovators. Growth indicators include recent research publications and active career listings. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes social media engagement and external content collaborations. Strategic observations suggest a focus on thought leadership and community building to differentiate in a competitive market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@symbolic.capital

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents a gap that could be exploited. There is no public vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is addressed through a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk under GDPR. Data protection officer contact and security policy documentation are not found, indicating room for improvement in governance and incident readiness. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Symbolic Capital

Description:

People-driven Web3 investing.

Key Services:
Web3 investingResearch publicationsFellowship programsCareer opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryFinsweet AttributesSuperflow
Platforms:
Webflow CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Superflow
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.symbolic.capital -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
ns53.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns54.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024121600, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:177ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.symbolic.capital -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The site includes custom scripts from Finsweet and Superflow for enhanced functionality. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks some security headers which are recommended for modern web applications. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website