Skip to main content

Is szagera.com a Scam? Security Check Results - szagera.com Reviews

S

Is szagera.com Safe? Security Analysis for Not Found

Check if szagera.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 4:56:06 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The domain szagera.com is registered since 2016 with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. as the registrar and hosting provider. However, the website content is inaccessible beyond a standard HTTP 404 Not Found error page, indicating no active or published business content. There are no metadata, structured data, forms, or contact information available on the site. The lack of content and policies suggests the website is either inactive or under development. From a technical perspective, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for secure web operations. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no modern web technologies or analytics tools are detected. The hosting provider is reputable, but the absence of content and security best practices reduces the site's digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present to ensure compliance with GDPR or other regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the lack of business presence on the website limits trust and credibility. Overall, the site poses minimal risk as it currently serves only an error page, but it lacks fundamental security and compliance features expected of an active business website. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding contact information, and implementing security headers to improve trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of website content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain is registered since 2016, but no company name, services, or market positioning is evident. The registrar is Alibaba Cloud, indicating hosting in China or via a Chinese provider. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or revenue models are identifiable. The lack of digital presence suggests the business is either non-operational or not publicly represented via this domain.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal and immature. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and DNSSEC, which are basic security controls. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The domain registration is legitimate but provides no additional trust signals. The site is currently low risk due to lack of content but would be vulnerable if business operations were conducted without improvements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is inaccessible beyond a 404 Not Found error page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.szagera.com
Issuer:RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1
Valid Until:9/27/2025 (54 days)
SANs:*.szagera.com, szagera.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:116.62.53.43
Name Servers:
dns10.hichina.comDNS only
dns9.hichina.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:378ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a 404 error page with minimal HTML content and no metadata or structured data. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, indicating technical debt and security risks. No analytics or marketing tools are present. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site requires modernization and implementation of basic web standards and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website