Skip to main content

Is szfw.org a Scam? Security Check Results - 北京盘石信用管理有限公司 Reviews

Is szfw.org Safe? Security Analysis for 北京盘石信用管理有限公司

Check if szfw.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
jQueryGrowingIO AnalyticsBaidu Analytics
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:17:08 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.cecdc.com represents Zhejiang Panshi Information Technology Co., Ltd., operating under Beijing Panshi Credit Management Co., Ltd. It serves as an authoritative third-party internet credit certification platform in China, providing services such as website safety certification, credit inquiries, and brand credit rankings. The platform is well-positioned in the market with partnerships involving major Chinese enterprises and government bodies, reflecting a strong trust foundation. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies including jQuery and analytics tools like GrowingIO and Baidu Analytics. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with good SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are not explicitly present. From a security and compliance perspective, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies and does not provide incident response contacts, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not negate the evident business legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy for its intended audience, but should enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen its risk profile and user trust.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGrowingIO AnalyticsBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on internet credit certification and trust services. It holds a strong market position as a government-recognized third-party platform with a business model centered on providing certification, credit data services, and research. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, data services, and consulting. The target customers are enterprises and internet users seeking trust verification. The partnership ecosystem includes major Chinese banks, e-commerce platforms, and government agencies, indicating robust industry integration. Growth indicators include active content updates and expansion into blockchain research. Strategic observations suggest the company benefits from government backing but should address transparency in domain registration and privacy policies to maintain competitive advantage.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@szfw.org

Phone Numbers (1)

057*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers and incident response information indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies and no GDPR indicators. Data protection practices are not explicitly stated, and there is no evidence of a dedicated security culture or incident readiness. The business impact of these gaps is moderate, potentially affecting user trust and regulatory compliance. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy policies, and providing incident contacts would improve the security posture significantly.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

北京盘石信用管理有限公司

Description:

浙江盘石信息技术股份有限公司 互联网信用认证平台。互联网信用认证平台隶属于北京盘石信用管理有限公司,是负责运行管理网站身份信息验证的权威第三方服务机构;是网站的“诚信身份证”,也是网民判别网站是否诚信的权威认证标识。

Key Services:
互联网信用认证网站安全信用认证信用查询信用品牌排名信用研究院区块链产业研究院天眼通曝光台
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGrowingIO AnalyticsBaidu Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
GrowingIOBaidu Analytics51.la
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
GrowingIOBaidu Analytics51.la
Marketing Tools:
GrowingIO AnalyticsBaidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

75 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(513 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:122.224.234.29
Name Servers:
dns10.hichina.com
dns9.hichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025042409, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:401ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and standard JavaScript libraries, supplemented by analytics tools like GrowingIO and Baidu Analytics. The HTML and CSS are valid and structured, supporting good SEO and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Technical risks include reliance on third-party analytics without clear privacy disclosures and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design frameworks and enhancing security configurations.
Analyze Another Website