Is t.co Safe? Security Analysis for Twitter, Inc.
Check if t.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Twitter, Inc. operates the t.co domain as a URL shortening service integrated within its social media platform to protect users from harmful content and enhance the quality of tweet surfacing. The website content is minimal but informative, clearly linking to official Twitter resources for privacy, terms of service, and help. The domain is well-established since 2010, consistent with Twitter's business timeline, and registered under Twitter, Inc. in the US, indicating strong legitimacy. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with no advanced frameworks detected. The page loads quickly and is accessible without any WAF or security challenges. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers are present, representing minor areas for improvement. The site is mobile basic optimized and has basic SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enforced, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, reflecting good security hygiene. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear links to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and GDPR compliance. Contact information is limited to a help/contact page link without direct emails or phone numbers on this page. Overall, the website is trustworthy, safe, and professionally maintained with a high legitimacy score. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Twitter holds a leading position in the global social media market, leveraging the t.co domain as a critical infrastructure component for URL shortening and user protection. Its business model centers on social media engagement, advertising, and developer ecosystem support. The company targets a broad general audience worldwide, operating at an enterprise scale with a strong brand presence. The website content and linked resources reflect a mature, well-established business with consistent branding and trust signals. Twitter's ecosystem includes extensive partnerships and developer tools, although no direct partner domains were identified on this page.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of the t.co domain is robust, with enforced HTTPS, domain status protections, and no detected vulnerabilities. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts were found on this page, which could improve transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is well addressed through linked policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from documented policies and advanced DNS security.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance domain security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Twitter, Inc.
Twitter uses the t.co domain as part of a service to protect users from harmful activity, to provide value for the developer ecosystem, and as a quality signal for surfacing relevant, interesting Tweets.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Domain status includes transfer and update prohibitions
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a functional informational page about Twitter's t.co URL shortening service.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration
LOWCurrent value: "0"
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
Strict DMARC Alignment
LOWStrict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 43 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings