Is tanx.fi Safe? Security Analysis for BRS Tech
Check if tanx.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
tanX is a newly established decentralized exchange platform targeting institutional traders, exchanges, and liquidity providers. The company, BRS Tech, registered in the British Virgin Islands in December 2023, positions itself as a high-performance, self-custodial liquidity network. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Framer platform, integrating Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. While the technical infrastructure is sound with HTTPS and modern web technologies, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and minimal contact information on the website indicate areas for improvement in compliance and transparency. Security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced domain security measures such as DNSSEC and published security policies. Overall, tanX appears to be a legitimate emerging player in the institutional DEX market, but it should enhance its privacy compliance and security disclosures to build greater trust.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
tanX operates in the blockchain and decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, focusing on institutional liquidity solutions. Its business model revolves around providing a decentralized exchange platform that emphasizes reliability and self-custody, appealing to professional traders and institutions. The offshore registration in the British Virgin Islands may be for regulatory or privacy reasons, common in crypto startups. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics but lacks visible partnerships or certifications. Growth potential exists given the niche market focus, but transparency and compliance enhancements are recommended to strengthen market credibility.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and integrates standard security practices but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits the site's security maturity. The use of offshore registration with minimal contact details may raise concerns for some stakeholders. To improve security posture, tanX should implement DNSSEC, publish security and incident response policies, and consider adding security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
BRS Tech
Reliable, self custodial and high performance liquidity network for traders, institutions and exchanges.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No DNSSEC
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 61 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings